期刊文献+

引入偏好序夹角研究社会选择结果的一致性 被引量:1

Study on Consistency in Social Choice Result by Using Angle Between Preference Profiles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于社会选择一致性的研究,传统的方法是将距离当作变量,若出现距离相等情况,便无法做出抉择。应引入距离以外的变量作为补充判断的工具。在总结前人对社会选择结果一致性研究成果的基础上,针对其存在问题,引入偏好夹角的概念。用偏好角度替代距离进行测度,弥补了传统方法的不足,并说明该思路的实用价值。 To study the social choice problem, traditional methods use distance as the variable to deal with preference. When the distance of different social choice results are equivalent, we can't determine which one to choose. The author suggests that angle between profiles of preferences should be used to judge consensus in social choice result. And an example is given to explain the procedure of the method.
出处 《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第4期290-292,共3页 Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
关键词 社会选择 一致性 偏好序夹角 social choice consistency angle between preference profiles
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1ARROW K J. Social Choice and Individual Values [M]. Wiley,New York: Wiley, 1963:5-8.
  • 2COOK W D, Kress M, Seiford L M. A general framework for distance-based consensus in ordinal ranking models [J]. European Journal Operational Research, 1996 ( 96 ) : 392-397.
  • 3方然.多准则群决策的一致性测度[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(1):22-27. 被引量:3
  • 4FARKAS D,NITZAN S. The borda rule and pareto stability :a comment [J]. econometrica, 1979 ( 49 ) : 1305 -1306.
  • 5MARCHANT T. The borda rule and paxeto stability : A further comment[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001 (120) :423-428.

共引文献2

同被引文献11

  • 1决策理论与方法[M]. 科学出版社, 2003.决策理论与方法[M]科学出版社,2003.
  • 2Shengli Wu.The weighted Condorcet fusion in information retrieval[J]. Information Processing and Management . 2013 (1)
  • 3Christian Klamler.On the Closeness Aspect of Three Voting Rules: Borda – Copeland – Maximin[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation . 2005 (3)
  • 4Porello D,Endriss U.Ontology merging as social choice. Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems . 2011
  • 5Barbera’,S.Manipulation of social choice mechanisms that do not leave “Too Much” to chance. Econometrica . 1977
  • 6Christian Geist,Ulle Endriss.Automated search for impossibility theorems in social choice theory: ranking sets of objects. Journal of Artificial Organs . 2011
  • 7Cook W D,Seiford L M.Priority ranking and consensus formation. Management Science . 1978
  • 8Alon Altman,Moshe Tennenholtz.Axiomatic foundations for ranking systems. Journal of Artificial Organs . 2008
  • 9Brandt F,et al.The computational complexity of choice sets. Mathematical Logic Quarterly . 2009
  • 10李武,陈妍,郭观七.序数偏好下多属性群决策的最小偏差法[J].管理学报,2010,7(5):781-784. 被引量:4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部