期刊文献+

时间价格敏感型需求下的供应链决策模式研究 被引量:52

Study on the Decision Mode of Supply Chain for Time-Sensitive and Price-Sensitive Demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在定制产品的市场竞争中,需求不仅对价格敏感,对时间也十分敏感。本文以一个两阶段的供应链系统为背景,研究了分散决策和集中决策两种模式下的MTO供应链决策问题。分别分析了两种模式下的决策过程,进行了优化求解。并结合一个汽车行业定制供应链实例进行了数值分析,证明了对于时间价格敏感型需求下的供应链决策问题,集中决策模式能够实现更大的供应链整体收益。这些研究工作为供应链企业在时间价格敏感型市场上竞争提供了有效的决策工具和方法。 In the market competition of customized products, demands are both time - sensitive and price-sensitive. In this papdr, the decision problem of MTO supply chain was studied separately in decentralized decision mode and centralized decision mode. The decision processes in two modes were analyzed and the optimal solutions were found. A numerical analysis was proposed with an application in Auto industry. It's proved that more profit of supply chain can be gained with the mode of centralized decision. Thus, and effective decision tool and method are provided for supply chain enterprise to compete in both time-sensitive and price-sensitive markets.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2006年第3期13-19,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70332001)
关键词 需求 供应链 决策模式 分散决策 集中决策 demand supply chain decision mode decentralized decision centralized decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Stalk G.Time-the next source of competition advantage[J].Harvard Business Review,1988,66 (4):41-51.
  • 2Hum S.H.,Sim H.H.Time-based competition:literature review and implications for modeling[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,1996,16(1):75-90.
  • 3戴维·刘易斯 达瑞恩·布里格.新消费者理念(译)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001..
  • 4张钦,达庆利,沈厚才.供应链中基于Stackelberg博弈的EOQ模型[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(3):38-42. 被引量:32
  • 5Lodree E.,Jang W.,and Kelein C.Minimizing response time in a two-stage supply chain system with variable lead time and stochastic demand[J].International Journal of production research,2004,42 (11):2263-2278.
  • 6李华,李益强,徐国华.供应链配送中的提前期模型研究[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(3):112-114. 被引量:14
  • 7Palaka K.,Erlebacher s.,Kropp D.H.Lead-time setting,capacity utilization,and pricing decisions under lead-time dependent demand[J].ⅡE Transactions,1998,30 (2):151-163.
  • 8So K.C.,Song J.S.Price,delivery time guarantess and capacity selection[J].European Journal of operational research,1998,111:28-49.
  • 9Li L,Lee Y.Pricing and delivery-time performance in a competitive environment[J].Management Science,1994,40(5):633-646.
  • 10Boyaci T.,Ray S.Product differentiation and capacity y cost interaction in time and price sensitive markets[J].Manufacturing & Service operations management,2003,5(1):18-36.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Hatoum K.M.,Chang Y L.Trade-off between lead time and price[J].Porduction Planning & Control,1997,8(2):158-172.
  • 2Mendelson,H.,Whang,S.Optimal incentive compatible priority ricing for the M/M/1 queue[J].Operations Research,1990,38(5):870-883.
  • 3Stalk G Jr.Time-the next source of competitive advantage[J].Harvard Business Review,1988,66(4):41-51.
  • 4Marucheck A.S.,Mcclelland M.K.Strategic issues in make-in-order manufacturing [J].Production and Inventory Management,1996,2(4):23-95.
  • 5Moorthy,S.,and Srinivasan,K.Signaling quality with a money-back guarantee:The role of transaction costs[J].Marketing Science,1995,14(4:442-466.
  • 6Bhargara,H.,Sundaresan,S.Contingency pricing for information goods and services under industry wide performance standard[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,2003,20(2):113-136.
  • 7Lax D.A.,and Sebenius,J.K.The manager as negotiator:Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain[M].1986,Free Press.
  • 8Bazerman,M.H.,and Gillespie,J.J.Betting on the future:The virtues of contingent contracts[J].Harvard Business Review,1999,77(5):155-160.
  • 9Hau L. Lee, Kut C. So, Christopher S. Tang. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain [ J ]. Management Science. 2000,46(5 ): 626 ~ 643.
  • 10Corbett C J, Groote X De. A supplier's optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information[ J]. Management Science. 2000,46( 3):444 ~ 450.

共引文献69

同被引文献630

引证文献52

二级引证文献187

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部