期刊文献+

混合PRB介质处理渗滤液污染地下水的可行性研究 被引量:10

Study on feasibility of mixture PRB media in remediation of contaminated groundwater by leachate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反应介质的选择是可渗透反应墙(PRB)系统原位处理污染地下水的一个关键问题。本实验采用两种混合介质A(陶粒与活性炭的混合物)和B(沸石与活性炭的混合物),对修复被渗滤液污染的地下水的可行性进行了研究。结果表明,混合介质A和B对CODCr的平均去除率分别达到了71.8%和63.4%;对NH4+的平均去除率分别为13.5%和58.7%;对重金属的去除,反应介质B则优于A。因此,PRB反应介质的选择要根据污染物的性质而定。 The selection of the reactive media is a key problem of in-situ remediation of contaminated groundwater in permeable reactive barrier (PRB) system. Two mixture media, viz. A (a mixture of ceramic grain and activated carbon) and B (a mixture of the zeolites and activated carbon) were used by the authors with studying their feasibility of remedying the leachate polluted groundwater. The experimental results indicate that the average CODCr removal ratio of the media A and B was up to 71.8 % and 63.4 % , and the NH4^+ average removal efficiency was 13.5 % and 58.7 %, respectively. However, the heavy metals removal efficiency of media B is better than that of A. Therefore the selection of reactive media of PRB mainly depends on property of contaminants.
出处 《世界地质》 CAS CSCD 2006年第2期182-186,共5页 World Geology
基金 国家自然科学基金(50478006) 吉林大学研究生创新中心资助
关键词 渗滤液 可渗透反应墙 混合介质 原位处理 leachate PRB mixture media in-situ remediation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献47

  • 1Anthony Adzomani,Jun Dong,Yan Jin.Laboratory Research into Permeable Reactive Barriers for Groundwater Remediation[J].Global Geology,2003,8(1):93-98. 被引量:2
  • 2DONG Jun, Anthony ADZOMANI and ZHAO Yongsheng(College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, P. R.China).Overview of In—Situ Biodegradation and Enhancement[J].Global Geology,2002,7(1):72-78. 被引量:4
  • 3郁飞远,刘光利,季碧良,辛民耀.氨氮废水的生化处理试验[J].兰化科技,1994,12(2):148-153. 被引量:7
  • 4比嘉照夫 冯玉润(译).拯救地球大变革[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1992..
  • 5.GB 13456-92.钢铁工业水污染物排放标准[S].,..
  • 6[1]Mackay, D. M. , J. A Cherry. Groundwater contamination: pump-and-treat remediation. Environmental Science and Technology, 1989,23(6) :630-636
  • 7[2]Beitinger E. Permeable treatment walls-design, construction and cost. NATO/CCMS pilot study 1998. Special Session, Treatment Walls and Permeable Reactive Barriers, U. S. EPA. Report No:542-R-98-003,1998, (229) :6-16
  • 8[3]Blowes D. W. Ptacek C. J, Cherry, J. A, Gillham, R. W, Robertson W. D. Passive remediation of groudwater using in situ treatment curtains. Geoenvironment 2000, Geotechnical Special Special Publication, ASCE, 1995, (46): 1588-1607
  • 9[4]R. C. Star, J. A. Cherry. In situ remediation of contaminat ed groundwater: the funnel-and-gate system. Joumal of Ground Water, 1994,32(3) :465-476
  • 10[5]Sheilds,M. S., M. J. Reagin,. Selection of pseudomonas cepacia strain constitutive for the degradation of trichloroethylene. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1992,58: 3977-3983

共引文献156

同被引文献155

引证文献10

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部