期刊文献+

垂直品质差异与技术授权策略选择 被引量:4

Vertical-Differentiation and Licensing Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在专利权人不参与市场生产的情况下,分别在无技术授权、按定额权利金方式授权、按单位权利金授权以及混合式授权等四种情况,来讨论本国独占厂商的产品品质与价格的决定、外国专利权人授权策略的选择以及相关福利水准的影响。本文发现定额权利金授权下的社会福利、消费者剩余与产品品质,均优于无技术授权、按单位权利金与按混合式授权的结果;在市场规模相对较小下,按单位权利金授权,本国厂商利润达到最高;在有技术授权的情况下,社会福利、消费者剩余与产品品质将恒不劣于无技术授权。 This paper, assuming the licensor does not participate in any production in the market, is to explore the following issues: how the domestic monopolist governs his product price and quality under four different contexts, say no technology licensing, fixed fee royalty, unit royalty, and mixed licensing etc. ; how the foreign licensor decides his licensing strategy, and how these decisions affect the welfare. In this study, it is found that the social welfare, consumer surplus, and the production quality under fixed fee royalty are better than those under other conditions: no technology licensing, unit royalty, and mixed licensing etc. However, as the market is relatively smaller, the domestic finn's profit under unit royalty is the highest among all the forgoing conditions. The social welfare, consumer surplus, and the production quality, no matter under what form of technology licensing, are by all means no less than that without technology licensing.
出处 《产业经济研究》 2006年第4期1-10,共10页 Industrial Economics Research
关键词 技术授权 专利权 垂直品质差异 technology licensing patent vertical quality difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1[1]ARROW K.Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[M].in R.R.Nelson (Ed.),The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity.Princeton:Princeton University Press,1962.
  • 2[2]KAMIEN M I,SCHWARTZ N.Market structure and innovation[M].Cambridge University Press,1982.
  • 3[3]KAMIEN M I,TAUMAN Y.The private value of patent:a game theoretic analysis[J].Journal of Economics (Supplement),1984(4):93-118.
  • 4[4]KAMIEN M I,TAUMAN Y.Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1986,101:471-491.
  • 5[5]MUTO S.On licensing policy in bertrand competition.Game and Economic Behavior,1993 (5):257-267.
  • 6[6]WANG X H.Fee versus royalty licensing in a cournot duopoly model.Economics Letters,1998,60:55-62.
  • 7[7]WANG X H.Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated cournot duopoly[J].Journal of Economics and Business,2002,54:253-266.
  • 8[8]MUSSA M,ROSEN S.Monopoly and product quality[J].Journal of Economic Theory,1978,18:301-317.
  • 9[9]AOKI R,PRUSA T J.Sequential versus simultaneous choice with endogenous quality[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,1996,15:103-121.
  • 10[10]LAMBERTINI L.Endogenous timing and the choice of quality in a vertically differentiated duopoly[J].Research in Economics,1998,53:101-109.

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部