期刊文献+

浅议古文献中的“敢”字可以训“能” 被引量:3

The Distinguishes between "Gan" and "Neng" in Chinese Ancient Literature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一般情况下,“敢”和“能”的区别是很明显的:前者强调主观上的积极性,后者着眼于客观上的可能性。但是,在古代文献上,有些“敢”字却不表示主观上的积极性,而是强调客观上的可能性,意义和用法与“能”字相当。“敢”字的这种用法不见于迄今为止出版的古汉语虚词词典,故有讨论的必要。 Generally speaking, there are obvious distinguishes between Chinese characters “Gan” and “Neng” with the former one more emphasizes on the positivity personally while the latter one more focuses on the possibility externally. However, some “Gan” in the ancient literature express the external possibility instead of the personal positivity, whose meaning and function are similar to the word “Neng”. Thus, it is necessary for us to explore this special function of “Gan” which even can't be found on the latest dictionary of empty word.
作者 纪国泰
出处 《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2006年第3期75-76,共2页 Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
关键词 古代文献 主观 客观 Gan Neng ancient literature personal external
  • 相关文献

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部