期刊文献+

论工具理性的规范性 被引量:3

On the Standardization of Instrumental Rationality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于工具理性的规范地位的争论是目前元伦理学和道德心理学中的一个核心争论,这个争论的重要性在于它关系到我们对规范性的本质和源泉的理解,进一步关系到我们对道德的本质和道德动机的理解。本文的目的是要表明,某些康德主义者对工具理性的本质和地位的理解是令人误解的,因此,他们也就歪曲了休谟的实践合理性概念。 The dispute over the standardizing functions of instrumental rationality is a key issue in meta-ethics and moral psychology because it is significantly related to our understanding of the nature and origin of standardization as well as the nature and motive of morality. The author of this paper points out that some Kantists have misunderstood its nature and functions and, as a result, misinterpreted Hume's rationality of practice.
作者 徐向东
机构地区 北京大学
出处 《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期29-38,共10页 The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Robert Audi.Practical Reasoning[M].New York:Routledge,1989.
  • 2[2]John Mackie.Ethics:Inventing Right and Wrong[M].London:Penguin Books,1977.
  • 3[3]Gilbert Harman.The Nature of Morality[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1977.
  • 4[4]Jean Hampton.The Authority of Reason[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998.
  • 5[5]Christine Korsgaard.The Normativity of Instrumental Reason[A].Ethics and Practical Reason[C].Oxford:Clarendon,1997.
  • 6[6]Annette Baier.A Progress of Sentiments[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1991.
  • 7[7]David Hume.A Treatise of Human Nature[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,second edition,1978.
  • 8[8]Kant.Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals[M].translated by James W.Ellington.Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company.
  • 9[9]Christine Korsgarrd.The Sources of Normativity[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部