期刊文献+

渤南洼陷古近系沙四段—沙三段烃源岩地球化学特征 被引量:17

Geochemical characteristics of Es_3-Es_4 source rocks in Eogene of Bonan Subsag
下载PDF
导出
摘要 质谱和质谱-色谱分析结果表明,渤南洼陷古近系沙四段上亚段和沙三段中、下亚段烃源岩正构烷烃碳数分布多呈单峰型,主峰碳多为C21-C24,无明显奇偶优势。受构造运动和古气候因素的控制,两者形成于不同的沉积环境。沙四段上亚段烃源岩的Pr/Ph值低,而伽马蜡烷含量高,指示着半咸水-咸水甚至盐湖相的强还原水体环境;沙三段中、下亚段烃源岩的Pr/Ph值稍高,而伽马蜡烷含量较低,指示着淡水-微咸水的还原环境。奇偶优势比、碳优势指数、C32藿烷22S/(22S+22R)、C29甾烷20S/(20S+20R)和ββ/(αα+ββ)等生物标志物参数表明,沙四段上亚段和沙三段中、下亚段烃源岩基本上达到成熟阶段,有利于油气生成。 GC and GC-MS analysis shows that carbon in normal paraffin hydrocarbons of mid-lower Es3 to upper Es4 source rocks in Eogene of Bonan Subsag displayed unimodal distribution with main peak from C21 to C24 without OEP values. Controlled by tectonic movement and paleoclimate, the two main source rocks were formed in different sedimentary paleoenvironments. The low value of Pr/Ph and the high gammacerane content indicate that the upper Es4 source rocks were generated in a strong reducing environment with brackish to saline facies. However,the relatively high value of Pr/Ph and low gammacerane content indicate that mid -lower Es3 source rocks were generated in reducing environment of fresh water to brackish water. Such biomarker parameters as OEP,CPI,22S/(22S +22R)of C32 hopane,20S/(20S+20R) and ββ/ (αα+ββ) of C29 sterane indicate that the source rocks of upper Es4 and mid-lower Es3 were basically mature and benefit to oil-gas generation.
出处 《油气地质与采收率》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期8-11,共4页 Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程方向性项目(KZCX2-113)部分成果
关键词 生物标志物 沉积环境 成熟度 油源对比 渤南洼陷 biomarkers, depositional environment,maturity,oil-source correlation, Bonan Subsag
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1康仁华,刘魁元,赵翠霞,金平信,彭德堂,罗顺社,李维锋,高振中.济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组沉积相[J].古地理学报,2002,4(4):19-29. 被引量:45
  • 2李维锋,高振中,彭德堂,罗顺社,何幼斌.胜利油田渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组沉积相[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(2):24-30. 被引量:15
  • 3黄第藩 李晋超.利用气相色谱资料探讨几种成油生源构成[J].石油与天然气地质,1982,3(4):251-259.
  • 4Koopmans M P,Bijpstra W I. A thermal and chemical degradation approach to decipher pristane and phytane precursor in sedimentary organic matter[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1999,30(9) : 1 089 -1 104.
  • 5Powen T, Mckirdy D M. Relationship between ratio of pristane to phytane, crude oil composition and geological environments in Australia [J]. Nature, 1973, (243):37 -39.
  • 6李任伟 李哲 王志珍 等.分子化石指标在中国东都盆地古环境分析中的应用[J].沉积学报,1988,6(4):108-108.
  • 7Brassell S C,Wardroper A M,Thomson J D,et al. Specific acyclic isoprenoids as biological markers of methanogenic bacteria in marine sediments[J]. Nature,1981, (290) :693 -696.
  • 8傅家谟,盛国英,许家友,贾蓉芬,范善发,彭平安,Eglinton,G.Gowar,A.P..应用生物标志化合物参数判识古沉积环境[J].地球化学,1991,20(1):1-12. 被引量:128
  • 9廖健德,罗力崇,吴运强,赵增义,康素芳,刘翠敏.吉木萨尔凹陷东斜坡区油气成藏分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2005,12(4):52-54. 被引量:26
  • 10Peters K E, Moldowan J M. The biomarker guide:interpreting molecule fossils in petroleum and ancient sediments[M]. New Jersey.Prentice Hall Inc,1993.

二级参考文献55

共引文献281

同被引文献224

引证文献17

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部