期刊文献+

超越现代和传统:发展的第三种模式 被引量:2

Beyond Modernity and Tradition: A Third Way for Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我们怎样理解世界(即我们形而上学的前提),在很大程度上决定了我们怎样对待世界。而我们怎样对待世界构成了我们的基本形态,这个形态影响着我们所做的每一件事情,我们的整个文化也来源于此。本文区分了三种基本形态:第一种是建立在宗教基础上的前物质主义社会或传统社会的形态,这是一种诉求的形态,即从超自然的资源中寻求帮助;第二种是物质主义社会或现代社会抑或非宗教社会的形态,这是一种工具主义形态,它主张按照人类的需要来主宰、统治和重塑世界;第三种是未来的(即将来的)后物质主义社会的形态,这些社会是后宗教的,但不是后精神的,它们的形态是让世界按照其本性自然发展,进一步说,是在人类意愿和非人类生命意愿之间寻找一种创造性的协同,参照道家的“无为”观点可以很好地阐述这种协同。 How we understand the world (our metaphysical premise ) determines, to a large degree, how we treat it. How we treat our world constitutes our basic modalities. The first is the modality of pre-materialist or traditional, religion-based societies. This is a modality of importuning, the seeking of assistance from supernatural sources. The second is the modality of materialist or modern, secular societies. This is a modality of instrumentalism, involving mastery, control and a will to re-make the world in accordance with human ends. The third is the modality of prospective or post-materialist societies. These societies would be post-religious but not post-spiritual. Their modality would be one of letting the world unfold according to its own nature, and, by extension, finding creative synergies between human and nonhuman desire. This modality of synergy is explicated by reference to the Daoist notion of wu wei.
出处 《南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2006年第2期5-17,共13页 Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 前物质主义 物质主义 后物质主义 无为 协同 pre-materialist materialist post-materialist wu wei synergy
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1[1]This kind of definition goes back to Max Weber and was developed by the Frankfurt School,particularly Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer.See their Dialectics of Enlightenment,Herder and Herder,New York,1932.
  • 2[2]See Charles Taylor,"Two Theories of Modernity ",International Scope Review,3,5,2001.There is no need,by the way,to resolve here Taylor's question whether modernity constitutes a particular form of culture or an operation that can be made on different cultures.In the sense in which I am using the term "modernity" it probably refers to a family of cultures,all resting on a shared metaphysical premise but drawing out the implications of that premise in different ways.
  • 3[3]Why can no society reject metaphysics? With no conception of the basic inclination of the universe towards us-favorable,unfavorable or neutral-it is impossible for societies to orient their collective agency:metaphysics frames the fundamental expectations of a culture.
  • 4[4]The dedication of modernity to novelty is reflected in the word "modern",which is derived from "mode",meaning "of the present",keeping up with the latest.
  • 5[5]An excellent contemporary account of the far reaching ramification of instrumental reason in the social and political life of modern societies is offered by Val Plumwood,Feminism and the Mastery of Nature,Routledge,London and New York,1992.
  • 6[6]See Dialectics of Enlightenment,op cit.
  • 7[7]See,for instance,Rachael Kohn,The New Believers:Reimagining God,HarperCollins,2005; and David Tacey,The Spirituality Revolution:the emergence of contemporary spirituality,HarperCollins,2003.
  • 8[8]It is worth noting here that I am not using the term "post-materialist" in the sense that has recently become current in sociological discourse."Post-materialist" in this sense means post-consumerist.It denotes an ethos that values community and ecology and spirituality alongside or above wealth and social status.Although post-materialism in this latter sense may indeed in some cases be an expression of a metaphysical premise that is post-materialist in the present sense,there is no necessary link,in the sociological literature of postmaterialism,between such a premise and the values that are taken to define post-consumerism.
  • 9[9]I have used this framework elsewhere to develop a version of a post-materialist cosmology.See The Ecological Self,Routledge,London,1991 and For Love of Matter,SUNY,Albany N Y,2003.
  • 10[10]The Dao of Confucianism is a way of accommodation,whereby the sage seeks not a fixed truth but a breadth of perspective that enables him to respond fittingly and appropriately to all the different circumstances in which he might find himself.See,for instance,Francois Jullien,"Did Philosophers Have to Become Fixated on Truth?",Critical Inquiry,28,4,2002.

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部