摘要
目的:比较来氟米特(LEF)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合用药与来氟米特、甲氨蝶呤单独用药的疗效和不良反应。方法:将96例活动性类风湿关节炎病人分为3组。联合用药组32例,口服LEF 10mg,每日1次,MTX 7.5mg,每周1次;LEF组32例,口服LEF 20mg,每日1次;用药前3d,两组均给予负荷剂量LEF 50mg/d;MTX组给予口服MTX 10mg,每周1次。观察评价休息痛、晨僵、握力、关节压痛指数、关节肿胀指数、生活能力、病人评价、医生评价、血沉、C-反应蛋白、类风湿因子等指标。结果:用药24周3组的主要疗效指标的改善差异无显著性,P>0.05。联合用药组和LEF组、MTX组的有效率分别为93.8%、90.6%、87.5%,不良反应发生率分别为31.3%、28.1%、43.8%。结论:联合用药疗效与单用来氟米特、甲氨蝶呤相近,但联合用药的不良反应稍高于单用来氟米特。
Objective: To compare the efficary and adverse reaction of leflunomide (LEF) plus methotrexate(MTX) ( Group LEF + MTX) and LEF alone (Group LEF),MTX alone(Group MTX) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods:96 cases were divided into three groups. 32 partients of the combination group administrated LEF 10mg, po, qd and MTX 7.5mg po, qw; 32 partients of LEF group recerived LEF 20mg,po,qd;32 patients of MTX group received MTX 10mg po, qw.At the first 3d,the dose Of LEF for all patients was 50mg/d. The indexes of the efficiency assessment included restpain, moring stiffness, gripping strength, count of joint tenderness(TJC), count of joint swollen (SJC), activities of daily living , ESR, C- reactive protein(CRP), RF. Results: No significant differences were found in efficiency assessment indexes between the three groups after 24 weeks treatment. The efficacy rate of group LEF + MTX was 93.8 %, 90.6 % for group LEF,87.5% for group MTX. The rate of adverse reaction was 31.3% in combination group and 28.1% in LEF greup,43.8% in MTX group. Conclusions:The efficacy of LEF combined with MTX in the treament of rheumatoid arthritis is similar between group LEF and group MTX alone. The rate of adverse reaction is a little higher in LEF and MTX combined therapy than in LEF alone.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2006年第14期495-496,501,共3页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health