期刊文献+

布什第二任期的国内政策议程及实施前景 被引量:3

The Domestic Policy Agenda in Bush's Second Term and Prospects for Its Implementation
原文传递
导出
摘要 在扼要论述总统选举与政策议程之间关系的基础上,本文对布什第二任期的国内政策议程及其出台的原因、实施前景和对美国政治的影响进行了分析。文章认为,布什在第二任内力图把施政重点由反恐和伊拉克战争转入国内,而国内政策议程的重点则放在社会政策立法的推进和实施上。布什提出的建立“业主社会”主张既是其第一任期国内政策的延续,又是一个比“有同情心的保守主义”立法计划更为庞大的政策议程,目的在于巩固和扩大共和党的选民基础,保持共和党在全国性选举中的多数地位。布什在第二任内提出如此庞大而保守的国内政策议程,既有政党和选举政治及深刻的经济和社会动因,也与布什保守的价值观、政治理念和个人抱负分不开。布什第二任内的国内政策议程的推动和实施将面临一系列严峻的挑战,对美政治也将产生一定的影响。 After briefly reviewing the relationship between American presidential elections and policy agendas, the article analyses the domestic policy agenda in Bush's second term, the causes for such an agenda, prospects for its implementation, and the impact on American politics. The article holds that Bush, in his second term, attempts to shift the focus of attention from anti-terrorism and the Iraqi War to domestic issues and to put the emphasis of domestic policy agenda on the promotion and implementation of social policy legislation. The project of the establishment of “ownership society” advanced by Bush is both a continuation of the domestic policy in his first term and a much broader policy agenda than the legislative plan of “compassionate conservatism.” The purpose of the project is to consolidate and broaden the Republicans’ voter base and to maintain the majority position of the Republican Party in national elections. Such a broad and conservative domestic policy agenda is motivated by partisan and election considerations. But it is also related to Bush's conservative values, political concepts and personal ambition. The promotion and implementation of the agenda are bound to encounter a series of critical challenges and will exert certain impact on American politics.
作者 张业亮
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期7-33,共27页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献72

  • 1Charles O. Jones, The Presidency in a Separated System (Washington D. C. : The Brookings Institution, 1994) p. 166.
  • 2Robin Toner and Richard W. Stevenson, "A Promise of Broad Changes," International Herald Tribune, October, November 5, 2004.
  • 3David Boaz,"Defining an Ownership Society," available at http//www. Cato. org/special/own-ership_ society/boaz/html.
  • 4Edmund L. Andrews and Robin Toner, " Bush's ‘Compassionate Conservatism’: Promises Fulfilled, Results Still Debated," International Herald Tribune, September 2, 2004.
  • 5John Kenneth Galbraith, The Affluent Society ( Boston.. Hough Mifflin, 1958).
  • 6Edmund L. Andrews, "Retirement Benefits: With or Without ‘ Ownership ', Deep Cuts Loom," International Herald Tribune, December 15, 2004.
  • 7David Boaz,"Defining an Ownership Society. "
  • 8Robin Toner and Richard W. Stevenson, "A Promise of Broad Changes. "
  • 9David E. Sanger, "Campaigning in Ohio, BushOffers Glimpses of His Convention Speech," International Herald Tribune, August 30, 2004.
  • 10David Nather, "Reinventing Bush Country," CQ Weekly, January 24, 2005.

共引文献31

同被引文献28

  • 1顾培东.司法能动主义的蕴含[J].法律适用,2010(Z1):11-14. 被引量:44
  • 2罗克全.“自由至上主义”如何为国家辩护——以诺齐克国家观为例[J].学海,2005(1):103-107. 被引量:3
  • 3理查德·A·波斯纳.超越法律[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.356.
  • 4北京大学法学院司法研究中心.宪法的精神[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2003.
  • 5克里斯托弗·沃尔夫.司法能动主义-自由的保障还是安全的威胁?[M].黄金荣,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:1,3-5.
  • 6肯恩·凯密克,范进学译.司法积极主义的起源和当代含义[G]//山东大学法学院法律方法研究中心.法律方法(第11卷).济南:山东人民出版社,2010.
  • 7娄正前.诉求与回应:当今中国能动司法的理论和实践[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.
  • 8施瓦茨,毕洪海、柯种等译.美国最高法院史[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 9霍姆斯,冉昊、姚中秋译.普通法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006.
  • 10本杰明·内森·卡多佐,苏力译.司法过程的性质[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部