期刊文献+

我国中央银行对外汇市场干预效力分析 被引量:23

A Study of Effectiveness of PBOC's Intervention with Foreign Exchange Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文主要对中央银行外汇市场干预的有效性进行了分析。中央银行干预外汇市场的基本方式包括冲销式干预和非冲销式干预,前者不会引起国内货币供应量的变动,可以借助利率机制间接强化干预效力。由于我国的利率形成机制尚未市场化,加上对资本项目的严格管制,非冲销式干预难以发挥其应有的作用。因此,增强我国中央银行对外汇市场干预效力的关键是要创造有利于市场干预的制度。 This article mainly analyses the central bank's effectiveness of intervention with the foreign exchange market. The intervention has two basic modes, including the sterilized intervention and the non-sterilized intervention. The former doesn't affect the money supply in the domestic market, and it can use the interest rate mechanism to strengthen the intervention's effectiveness indirectly. Because China's interest rate is not determined by the market, in addition to the strictly controlled capital account, it is difficult for the non-sterilized intervention to play its role. Therefore, the key to strengthen effectiveness of PBOC ' s intervention is to create a system, which is conducive to market intervention.
作者 郭田勇 陈佳
出处 《国际金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第7期57-61,共5页 Studies of International Finance
基金 教育部哲学社会科学重大研究项目<金融体制改革与货币问题研究>(编号:04JZD0013)的部分研究成果。
关键词 中央银行 外汇市场干预 干预效力 Central Bank Foreign Exchange Market Intervention Effectiveness of Intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1王维安等.“外汇市场干预的有效性分析”[J].浙江大学学报,2005,(1).
  • 2曾振宇.非对称管制下的外汇市场干预:绩效与缺陷[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2003(4):42-46. 被引量:7
  • 3易纲,范敏.人民币汇率的决定因素及走势分析[J].经济研究,1997,32(10):26-35. 被引量:279
  • 4Branson, W. H. Asset Markets and Relative Prices in Exchange Rate Determination, Princeton Studies in International Finance, No.20, Prineston University Press, 1997.
  • 5Paul R. Krugnum and Maurice Obs tfeld: "International Economics: Theory and Policy" , Fourth Edition,1997,Addison-Weley Longman.
  • 6Frederic S. Mishkin: (The Economies of Money, Banking and Financial markets) , 1995.

二级参考文献12

  • 1[4]Colvo, C. Reinhart, M. Fear of floating. NBER Working Paper No. 7993,2000
  • 2[5]Dominguez, K. M. The market microstructure of central bank intervention. NBER Working Popeer NO. 7337,2000
  • 3[6]Dominguez, K. M. Frankel J. A. Does foreign-exchange intervention matter? the portfolio effect. American Economic Review,1993(83): 1356 ~ 1369
  • 4[7]Emmoott, Bill. The deadly sins of government, AWG Loterary Agency, 1996
  • 5[8]Engle, R. F. Rodrigues. A. P. Tests of international CAPM with time-varying covariance. NBER Working Paper, NO.2303,1987
  • 6[9]Evans,Martin D.Lyons Richard K. Order flow and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy,2002:110,170~ 181
  • 7[10]Frankel, J. A. Rose, A. K. A survey of empirical research o nominal exchange rate, NBER Working Paper, No .4865,1994
  • 8[11]Mark, Nelson C. Time varying betas and risk premium in the pricing of foward foreign exchange contracts, Journal of Financial Economics, 1988(22) :335 ~ 354
  • 9[12]McKonzic, M. The economics of exchange rate volatility asymmetry. international Journal of Finance and Economics, 2002(7) :247 ~ 260
  • 10[13]Obsffeld, M. The effectiveness of foreign-exchange intervention:recent experience, 1985 ~ 1988,in International policy coordination and exchange rate fluctuations. Edited by Branson, W. H. et al. The University of Chicago Press, 1990:197 ~ 237

共引文献284

同被引文献272

引证文献23

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部