期刊文献+

基于能值分析理论的生态足迹模型及应用——以江苏省为例 被引量:155

A Modified Model of Ecological Footprint Calculation Based on the Theory of Emergy Analysis-Taking Jiangsu Province as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在对传统生态足迹模型进行简要分析的基础上,提出基于能值分析理论的生态足迹计算模型。该改进生态足迹模型通过将生态经济系统中的各种能量流换算成对应的生物生产性土地面积,并比较计算得到的生态足迹和生态承载力,从而衡量研究区域的环境可持续发展状况。论文以江苏省为例,应用改进生态足迹模型分析其2003年生态经济系统的环境状况,得到人均生态承载力为0.2997hm 2/人,人均生态足迹为4.7228hm 2/人,生态足迹超过生态承载力,与传统生态足迹模型的计算结果相一致。但与传统生态足迹模型相比,改进生态足迹模型的计算结果能更真实地反映生态经济系统的环境状况。 Associated with rapid development of economy and increase of population,we face a series of contradictions among the natural resources,environment and economy,such as resources depression,environmental deterioration and so on.To be sustainable,humanity must live within the limits of nature's carrying capacity.In the 1990s,Rees and Wackernagel put forward the ecological footprints model,which offers an easy and rapid method to measure the environmental situations of eco-economic system. The aim of the paper is to show a modified model of ecological footprint calculation by combining emergy analysis with conventional ecological footprint model of calculations,in the framework of the theory of ecological footprint,to apply the method of emergy analysis and introduce the concept of emergy density into the calculation models,in order to translate all kinds of energy flows in the eco-economic systems into the corresponding biological productive units. In this paper we present a new method of ecological footprint calculation,based on the emergy analysis.The translation of human demand of natural resources and the supply of nature services into understandable and quantifiable concepts is the main objective of this new method.Firstly, the amounts of human consumption corresponding to six categories of ecological productive areas and the amounts of natural supply are calculated.And then,these amounts are translated into common unit emergy through the emergy analysis.Thirdly,in this new method we are proposing, we will derive the ecological footprint and carrying capacity by dividing the emergy amounts by the emergy density.Finally,we compare the ecological footprint with the carrying capacity to measure the environmental status of sustainability in the given region. With Jiangsu Province in the year 2003 as an example,we apply the modified model to it to analyze the ecological environmental situations.According to the calculation equations,we get the annual total emergy amount of Jiangsu was 7.828×10^21sej and its emergy density was 7.629×10^21sej/ha.And then we get the carrying capacity of Jiangsu was 0.299 7ha/cap,the ecological footprint of biological resources and energy resources was 4.722 8hafcap,and the ecological deficit was 4.423 2ha/cap.So we conclude that the ecological footprint of Jiangsu has exceeded its carrying capacity,which conforms with the calculation results of conventional model of ecological footprints.This indicates that the new method of ecological footprint calculation is effective and feasible. By analyzing the strong points of the modified model,we find that the calculation results of the modified model give a more realistic picture of the environmental situations of the eco-economic systems,compared to the conventional one.
出处 《自然资源学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期653-660,共8页 Journal of Natural Resources
基金 国家自然科学基金(40371106) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK2005080) 教育部"跨世纪优秀人才培养计划"基金(2003) 江苏省"青蓝工程中青年学术带头人培养计划"基金(2002)联合资助
关键词 生态足迹模型 能值分析 生态足迹 生态承载力 江苏省 ecological footprint model emergy analysis ecological footprint carrying capacity Jiangsu province
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Wackernagel M,Rees W.Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M].Gabriola Island:New Society Publishers,1996.
  • 2李利锋,成升魁.生态占用——衡量可持续发展的新指标[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4):375-382. 被引量:170
  • 3杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁.生态足迹分析理论与方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-636. 被引量:643
  • 4Wackernagel M,Rees W E.Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital:Economics from an ecological footprint perspective[J].Ecological Economics,1997,20:3-24.
  • 5William E Rees.Revisiting carrying-capacity:Area-based indicators of sustainability[EB/OL].http//www.dieoff.com/page/110.htm,1997.
  • 6徐中民,张志强,程国栋.甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(5):607-616. 被引量:826
  • 7Wackernagel M,Silverstein J.Big things first:focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint[J].Ecological Economics,2000,32(3):391-394.
  • 8Vuuren D P,Smeets E MW.Ecological footprints of Benin,Bhutan,Costa Rica and the Netherlands[J].Ecological Economics,2000,34(1):115-130.
  • 9Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello P,et al.National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J].Ecological Economics,1999,29:375-390.
  • 10蓝盛芳,钦佩.生态系统的能值分析[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(1):129-131. 被引量:360

二级参考文献61

  • 1[1] William E R. Revisiting Carrying Capacity: Area-Based Indicators of Sustainability[A]. In:Wackernagel M, ed. Ecological Footprints of Nations[EB/OL] http://www.ecouncil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint/,1996.
  • 2[2] 李永展.台湾地区生态足迹量度之研究[Z].台湾区域科学学会98年度年会论文研讨会(B),2000.
  • 3[3] Wackernagel M. Ecological Footprints of Nations[EB/OL].See: http://www.encouncil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint.html,1997.
  • 4[4] William E R. Ecological Footprints And Sustainability Gap.
  • 5[EB/OL] http://www.interchg.ubc.ca/plan/scarp.html,1996.
  • 6[5] Wackernagel M. The Ecological Footprints of Santiago de Chile[EB/OL]. http://www.iclei.org/iclei/santiago.html,1998.
  • 7[6] Wackernagel M. What We Use and What We Have: Ecological Footprint and Ecological Capacity[EB/OL]. http://www.rprogress.org/resources/,1999.
  • 8[7] Lower Fraser Basin Eco-Research Project. How sustainable are our choices[EB/OL].See: http://www.ire.ubc.ca/ecoresearch/ecoftpr.html,2000.
  • 9张耀辉,农业现代化研究,1998年,19卷,24页
  • 10钦佩,Ecol Eng,1997年,8卷,5页

共引文献1861

同被引文献2250

引证文献155

二级引证文献1286

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部