期刊文献+

极光区电离层扰动的两种类型 被引量:1

TWO TYPES OF IONOSPHERIC DISTURBANCE IN THE AURORAL REGION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从EISCAT探测资料分析确认,沉降粒子对极光区电离层的电离生成率有极重要的作用,但高能和低能粒子的有效电离高度范围完全不同,另一方面,磁层对流的增强却常使F层电子密度N下降,1985年1月28~29日期间出现N(E层)N(F层),且147km以上N随高度增加而下降的典型扰动剖面。这是高能粒子和强磁层对流共同作用的结果。1993年2月16~17日期间,中午前后NmF异常地增大,而N(E层)却无明显变化。这是与前者特征不同的另一类典型剖面。 The EISCAT data are used to confirm the important role of precipitation particles in the ionization rate in the auroral region. The height range of the effective ionization is quite different for particles with different energies. On the other hand,an enhancement of magnetospheric convection often results in decreasing of electron density, N, in the F layer. During 28~29 January, 1985, the disturbed profile of N was very typical, in which N(E layer)N(F layer) and N decreased with height above 147km.This phenomenon was caused by both energetic particles and intensive convection.During the period of 16~17 February, 1993, however, the N(F layer) increased extremely, while N(E layer) remained low. This is also a typical profile, but is opposite to that of the former one. In this case, the particles with lower energy( < 1keV) in the magnetosheath entered directly the high latitude ionosphere through the cusp, and can contribute significantly to the F layer ionization content.
出处 《南极研究》 CSCD 1996年第4期11-19,共9页
基金 国家自然科学基金
关键词 沉降粒子 磁层对流 极隙区 极光区 电离层 s precipitation particles, magnetospheric convection, cusp, auroral ionosphere.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献1

同被引文献15

  • 1Robinson B J. Experimental investigations of the ionospheric E-layer. Rep. Progr. Phys. 1959, 22:241 - 274.
  • 2Robinson B J. Diurnal variations of the electron distribution in the ionospheric E-layer. J. Atoma. Terr. Phys., 1960, 18 (2/3) :215 - 233.
  • 3Banks P M, Sehunk R W, Raitt W J. NO and O in the high latitude F-region. Geophys. Res. Lett, 1974, 1(6) : 239 - 242.
  • 4Rishbeth H, Garriott O K. Introduction to Ionospheric Physics.New York and London: Academic Press, 1969.
  • 5Matsushita S. A study of the morphology of ionospheric storms. J.Geophys. Res., 1959, 64(3) : 305 - 321.
  • 6Kohl H. The polar F-region-theory. In: Deehr C S, et al. ed.Exploration of the Polar Upper Atmosphere. Dordrecht: Holland /Boston: USA / London: England: D. Reidel Publ. Comp., 1980.55 - 66.
  • 7Funer-Rowell T J, Evans D S. Height-integrated Pedersen and Hall conductivity patterns inferred from the TIROS-NOAA satellite data.J. Geophys. Res., 1987, 92(A7) : 7606- 7618.
  • 8Evans D S. Global statistical patterns of auroral phenomena. In:Proceeding of the Symposium on Quantitative Modeling ofMagnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling Processes. Kyoto, 1987. 325.
  • 9Gussehoven M S, Hardy D A, Burke W J. DMSP/F2 electronobservations of equatorward auroral boundaries and their relationship to magnetospheric electric fields. J. Geophys. Res., 1981, 86(A2) : 768 ~ 778.
  • 10Gussehoven M S, Hardy D A, Heinemann N. Systematics of the equatorward diffuse auroral boundary. J. Geophys. Res., 1983,88(A7) : 5692 - 5708.

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部