2HORVATH M, RYAN A M. The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-effi-cacy on Test-taker Perceptions [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision, 2000,83 (2).
3PLOYHART R E, RHART K H, HAYES S C. Using At- tributions to Understand the Effects of Explanations on Ap- plicant Reactions: Are Reactions Consistent with the Cova- riation Principle? I J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychol- ogy, 2005,35 (2).
4SAKS A M, MCCARTHY J M. Effects of Discriminatory Interview Questions and Gender on Applicant Reactions [ J ]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2006,21 (2).
5DAVIS J H, SCHOORMAN F D, MAYER R C. The Trus- ted General Manager and Business Unit Performance: Em- pirical Evidence of a Competitive Advantage [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21 ( 5 ).
6DIRKS K T, FERRIN D L. Trust in Leadership: Meta-an- alytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002,87 (4).
7GILLILAND S W. The Perceived Fairness of Selection Sys- tems: An Organizational Justice Perspective [ J ]. The A- cademy of Management Review, 1993,18 (4).
8BURNS G N, SIERS B P. Effects of Providing Pre-Test In- formation and Preparation Materials on Applicant Reactions to Selection procedures [ J ]. International Journal of Selec- tion and Assessment, 2008,16( 1 ).
9ROLLAND F, STEINER D D. Test-taker Reactions to the Selection Process: Effects of Outcome Favorability, Expla- nations, and Voice on Fairness Perceptions [ J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2007,37(12).
10CHAPMAN D S, UGGERSLEVA K L, WEBSTER J. Ap- plicant Reactions to Face-to-face and Technology-mediated Interviews : A Field Investigation [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003,88 (5).
