后殖民文化研究中的经典法农

Canonizing Frantz Fanon in Postcolonial Cultural Studies

经历了1960年代非洲“法农主义”、1960年代末和70年代初美国新左派、黑豹党的“暴力法农”，1980年代后的“批判性法农”标志着“法农经典”已经从激进的反殖民政治转变为学院型“后殖民文化研究”。法农因结合了殖民和主体建构问题而受到后殖民研究者的青睐。法农的作品多有歧义。学院型的后殖民研究者们对法农的解读反映了他们的个人兴趣，与作为革命者和政治活动家的法农已相去甚远。

After the African ＂Fanonism＂ of the 1960s, and the ＂violent Fan- on＂ of the American New Left and Black Panther of the late 1960s and the early 1970s, the ＂Critical Fanonism＂ of the 1980s marks a crucial divide. Fanonism has shifted from radical anti-colonialist politics to the academic ＂postcolonial cultural studies＂. It attracts the attention and interest from the post-colonialists because of its concern with colonialism and the establishment of subjectivity of the minority. However, Fanon＇s writings are controversial and invite multi-interpretations. The readings of Fanon by postcolonial theorists such as Edward Said, Homi Bhabha, Gayatri Spivak, Benita Parry, and Abdul R. JanMohamed, reflect their own interest. Many of their readings seem to suggest that the postcolonial cultural studies have shied away from engaging with Fanon as a revolutionary and political actor.