WTO与我国行政诉讼制度的改造

WTO and the Improvement of China's Administrative Litigation System

现行行政诉讼制度离WTO司法审查原则的要求尚有相当的距离。从行政诉讼的目的之一即人权保障着眼,行政诉讼需提供具有完整性和实效性的权利救济制度;从行政诉讼的手段即审查行政行为的合法性出发,其转变关键在于正确理解“合法性”的丰富蕴涵。WTO规则在国内的实施,迫使我们建立完备的司法审查制度,主要是建立两种可行的审查机制:一是推行行政诉讼体制改革,确立对规章和其他规范性文件的合法性审查机制;二是建立违宪审查机制,负责审查违宪或违法的法律、法规以及规章。

There is a big gap between the existing administrative litigation system and the requirement of WTO judicial review principle. With a view to the human rights protection, administrative litigation system should have an integrated and effectual remedy system. As to the validity examination of administrative action, the key of the alteration is how to apprehend ＂validity＂ accurately. The implementation of WTO rules impels us to build a perfect judicial examination system with at least two reviewing programs： a validity reviewing program, and a legality reviewing program.