期刊文献+

拉伸仪不同方法测定面团流变学特性的比较与分析 被引量:8

Comparison and Analysis on the Dough Rheological Properties in Different Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了验证拉伸仪分析方法间测定结果的差异,采用三种拉伸仪方法(AACC 54-10、GB/T14615-1993、Brabender仪器方法)对强筋、中筋、弱筋类型的9个小麦品种进行了比较。结果表明:3种方法的测定结果有一定差异。拉伸阻力间的差异大于延伸性的差异;强筋类品种的变异幅度大于中筋类和弱筋类品种。强筋、中筋、弱筋品种拉伸阻力的变异系数分别为17.64%、7.58%、6.05%,延伸性的变异系数为9.34%、4.07%、3.52%。强筋类品种的拉伸阻力值AACC方法最高,Brabender仪器方法最低。 In order to compare the differeces among three extensograph methods (AACC 54--10, GB/T 14615-1993,Brabender extensograph method), three quality types of wheat were collected. They were strong gluten, medium gluten and weak gluten The results indicated that parameters of extensogram were different in three methods. The differences were .remarkable in resistance of strong gluten wheat, the variation range of strong gluten wheat was the lorger than medium and weak gluten. The differences of resistance were bigger than the extensibility, the variation coefficient of resistance of strong gluten,medium gluten and weak gluten varieties were17. 64%,7.58% and 6.05 % respectively; the variation coefficient of extensibility were 9.34%, 4. 07%,3.52% respectively. Resistance value of strong gluten wheat with AACC54--10 method were the highest , Brabender extensograph method were the lowest.
出处 《黑龙江农业科学》 2006年第4期75-78,共4页 Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences
关键词 小麦 拉伸方法 差异 比较 wheat extensogram methods difference comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1魏益民.谷物品质与食品品质[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2002..
  • 2柯惠玲 李庆龙.谷物品质分析[M].武汉:湖北科学出版社,1989..
  • 3贾永波.拉伸仪的操作方法对检测结果的影响[J].食品科技,1999,24(5):48-50. 被引量:2
  • 4AACC 54-10,美国谷物化学家协会审批方法《面团拉力测定-常用法》[S].
  • 5GB/T 14615-93,中华人民共和国国家标准《面团拉伸性能测定法-拉伸仪法》[S].

二级参考文献1

  • 1柯惠玲.谷物品质分析[M].湖北科学技术出版社,1994..

共引文献45

同被引文献89

引证文献8

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部