期刊文献+

后腹腔镜技术治疗输尿管结石(附31例报告) 被引量:11

Clinical significance of retroperitoneal laparoscopy for ureteral calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石治疗输尿管结石的适应证、手术技巧和临床价值。方法回顾分析采用后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗输尿管结石31例,其中输尿管上段结石22例,中段结石9例。15例术前行体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)没有效果;2例行输尿管镜取石术失败;14例术前未行其他治疗。结石直径12-25 mm,平均18.5 mm。结果31例患者取石均成功,手术时间50-130 min,平均85 min;术中出血量20-60 mL,平均35 mL。术后无漏尿;患者术后1-2 d拔除后腹膜腔引流管,术后住院3-6 d。随访2-24个月,患者肾、输尿管积水均明显好转,无结石复发和输尿管切开缝合处狭窄。结论后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术可作为体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)或输尿管镜(URL)治疗输尿管结石失败的补救措施,对于较大的输尿管结石可作为首选的治疗方法。 Objective To evaluate the selection of indications, surgical techniques and clinical effects of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy. Methods The clinical data of 31 cases (23 males and 8 females) of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 31 cases, 22 had upper ureter stones and 9 middle ureter stones. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy was carried out in 17 patients as a salvage procedure after unsuccessful ESWL or ureteroscopy, and in 14 patients as a primary procedure. The stone size ranged from 12 mm to 25 mm(mean 18.5 mm). Results All the 31 cases underwent retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy successfully. The operative time ranged from 50 to 130 min(mean 85 min) ; the intraoperative blood loss from 20 to 60 mL(mean 35 mL) postoperatively. The retroperitoneal drainage tubes were removed after 1 to 2 days post operation. The postoperative hospital stay was 3 to 6 days. During the follow-up period(2--24 months), no ureteric stricture or recurrent calculus were found. B ultrasound and IVP examinations showed that hydronephrosis and hydroureterosis were lessened. Conclusion As a salvage procedure for failed ESWL and URL, retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy is safe, reliable and minimally invasive. It can partially replace conventional open surgery, and in selected patients with large chronically impacted upper ureteric stones, it may be considered as the first choice of treatment.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2006年第4期212-214,共3页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 后腹腔镜技术 输尿管结石 治疗学 retroperitoneal laparoscopy ureteric calculus therapeutics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献44

  • 1Nualyong C, Taweemonkongsap T. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteric calculi. J Med Assoc Thai, 1999,82:1028--1033.
  • 2Gaur D D, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai M R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int, 2002,89 : 339-- 343.
  • 3Brunaud L,Bresler L,Zarnegar R,et al. Does Robotic Adrenalectomy Improve Patient Quality of Life When Compared to Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy? World J Surg,2004,28(11):1180- 1185.
  • 4Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Tewari A, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol,2001,166(1):200- 1.
  • 5Marella VK,Wise GJ,Silver DA. Adjunctive technologies in laparoscopic nephrectomy- comparison of hand - assisted and robotic - assisted techniques. J Urol,2004,171 :pp338.
  • 6EichelL,AhleringTE,Clayman RV.Role of robotics in laparoscopic urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am,2004,31(4):781 -92.
  • 7Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic- assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology,2004,64(5) :914 - 8.
  • 8Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, et al. Rbbootic - assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation, 2002,73(9): 1474 - 9.
  • 9Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G,et al. Anderson- Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology,2002,60(3) :509 - 13.
  • 10Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol,2002,42(5) :453-7.

共引文献521

同被引文献48

引证文献11

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部