摘要
我国已在1999年合同法中建立了代位权制度,涉外代位权问题的法律冲突和法律适用问题值得研究。从功能比较的意义上看,两大法系都有类似的制度,但在立法目的和政策、代位权行使的程序、代位权的性质、内容等方面又有诸多差异。通过比较研究各国有关代位权法律适用的立法,提出涉外代位权法律冲突应重叠适用债权人与债务人关系的准据法和债务人与次债务人关系的准据法的观点。
We constitute our system for creditor's right of subrogation in contract law in 1999, So it is necessary to study this question related foreign factors. In sight of the functional comparative law, the two legal systems all have the similar institutions, but they have a lot of differences in legal targets and policies, procedures, natures, contents, and so on. By comparing many countries" applicable law in this question, the writer argues that the conflict of laws in creditor's right of subrogation should be settled by using the two applicable laws, not only the law between the creditor and the debtor, but also the debtor and sub-debtor.
出处
《甘肃政法学院学报》
CSSCI
2006年第4期61-66,共6页
Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词
代位权
功能比较
准据法
creditor's right of subrogation
functional comparison
the applicable law