《新唐书》、《全唐文》所载《对<论语>问》辨误

A Critical Study of DOUBTS ABOUT LUNYU Recorded in XIN TANG SHU and QUAN TANG WEN

孔颖达的《对<论语>问》,是一篇精美的政论文,但宋代俞德邻认为,唐太宗误认曾子为孔子,而颖达竟不省,故责其告君欠谨。俞德邻的解读依据《新唐书》。根据《贞观政要》、《旧唐书》、《十三经注疏》、《全唐文》,《新唐书》所载《对<论语>问》错误有二:其一,张冠李戴;其二,文体不合。同时,《全唐文》等文献所载《对<论语>问》的几处异文值得商榷。

DOUBTS ABOUT LUN by KONG Ying-da is an excellent political essay. However, according to the book of XIN TANG SHU, YU De-lin in Song Dynasty believes that KONG Ying-da knows nothing about the fact that emperor TANG tai-zong mistakes ZENG Zi for KONG Zi. In accordance with ZHEN GUAN ZHENG YAO, JIU TANG SHU, SHI SAN JING ZHU SHU and QUAN TANG WEN, DOUBTS ABOUT LUNYU recorded in XIN TANG SHU has two serious mistakes： confusing one thing with another and improper literary style.