摘要
目的观察高血压脑出血微创碎吸术(微创组)与开颅清除术(开颅组)两种治疗方式的临床效果。方法回顾性对比我院2002-01~2005—11进行的微创碎吸病例116例和开颅术96例,分析比较两者术后死亡率、神经功能缺损、生活自理能力、出血部位、出血量、手术时机与疗效的关系。结果两组方式在死亡率、出血部位、出血量、自理能力、手术时机与疗效关系上有差异。结论微创碎吸术简便、安全、疗效确切、病死率低,有利于提高病人生活质量,改善患者愈合。
Objective To observe the differen clinical result of two ways of the including microtramatic debris-suction and craniotomic clearance to encephalic haematoma resulted from hypertension, which may offer some indications to clinical practice. Methods Retrospectively 116 cases of microtramatic debris-suction and 96 cases of craniotomy clearance from January 2002 to November 2005 in our hospital were investigated to compare the moralities, neural dysfunctions, self-dependence on lives, hemorrhage volume and position,the correlations between surgery opportunity and treatment effectiveness of post-surgery in the two different therapeutic ways. Results There were significant differences between two ways of treatment in morality,hemorrhage volume , hemorrhage position,self-dependence and the correlation between surgery opportunity and effectiveness. Conclusion Microtranatic debrissvction is simple,safe,affirmatively effective and it makes the mortality lower. It can also improve pathients's lives and prognosis.
出处
《中国实用神经疾病杂志》
2006年第4期35-37,共3页
Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases
关键词
颅内血肿
微创碎吸
开颅清除
Encephalic haematoma
Microtranatic debris-suetion
Craniotomy clearance