期刊文献+

3个不同检测系统血糖测定结果的偏倚评估 被引量:7

Comparability Research on Blood Glucose Results among 3 kinds of Detection Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对3个检测系统进行方法对比分析,探讨各系统之间检测血糖(Glu)结果偏倚是否可以接受。方法参照NCCLS《EP9-A2文件》的要求,以可溯源的检测系统为目标检测系统,采用己糖激酶法或葡萄糖氧化酶法测定Glu,对本院3个不同检测系统进行朗道质控物(水平2和水平3)各测定20次和测定新鲜血浆标本48份。结果朗道质控物和新鲜血浆标本Glu测定经随机区组设计资料的方差分析,各检测系统间的总体差异均有显著性(P<0.001)。各检测系统新鲜血浆标本Glu测定可靠性系数α为0.9993,各系统间的相关系数均大于0.975。各检测系统测定Glu的精密度变异系数均小于3.3%,以可溯源的检测系统1为目标检测系统,临床可接受性能评价各系统均未超过T±5%范围。结论3个不同检测系统测定Glu结果存在偏倚,但具有可比性。 Objective Discuss the comparability of blood glucose(Glu) results with 3 detection systems, Methods Third different kinds of biochemistry detection systems were used to detect plasma Glu concentrations at 2 levels of Randox quality controls and 48 clinical plasma according to EP9-A2 file. The collected data were deal with statistics analysis. Results Analysis of variance showed Glu results from different control and patients plasma have significant difference in various detection system (P〈0.001). The correlation coefficient of each detection system was above 0.975 and the reliability coefficient of them was 0. 9993. The CV value of All detection systems was not excelled T±3.3% by precision assessment. Target system 1 was regarded as standard detection system and evaluated the acceptability of other detection system. As a result, All detection systems were not excelled T±5% by clinic assessment. Conclusions The precision of Glu results in the 3 kinds of detection systems accorded to clinic requirement.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2006年第14期4-6,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)课题资助(2004AA2Z3762)
关键词 检测系统 血糖 比对试验 Detection system Blood Glucose comparative test
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1朱忠勇.实用医学检验学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1997.243-353.
  • 2李影林.中华医学检验全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.458-459.
  • 3U. S. Department of Health and human Services. Medicare,Medicaid and CLIA program: Regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment of 1988(CLIA). Final rule[J]. Fed Regist, 1992,57(40):7002-7186
  • 4CLSI. Method comparison and bias evaluation usingp atients samples; approved guideline-second edition[J].EP9-A2,2002,22(19):1-52
  • 5CLSI. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods; approved guideline-second edition[J].EP5-A2,2004,24(25):1-38

共引文献73

同被引文献31

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部