期刊文献+

多器官功能障碍综合征病情严重度评分及预后评估系统在预测住院病死率中的作用 被引量:19

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome scoring system in predicting inhospital mortality
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)诊断标准、病情严重度评分及预后评估系统(简称MODS诊断草案)与急性生理和慢性健康评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)系统对MODS患者住院病死率的预测力。方法前瞻性搜集725例MODS患者的临床和实验室数据,应用MODS诊断草案判定该组患者器官系统功能状态并计算相应的MODS总分,另外计算该组患者的APACHEⅡ评分分值,应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较二者对MODS患者住院病死率的预测能力。结果总的住院病死率58.2%,ICU病死率55.3%。住院天数的中位数16 d,住ICU天数的中位数8 d。APACHEⅡ分值7~50分,中位数22分。725例MODS患者严重度评分分值为1~25分,平均9.7分,中位数9.0分。按照MODS诊断草案判断出障碍器官系统的数目与住院病死率、本草案病情严重度分值和APACHEⅡ分值呈正相关。上述三者均随着障碍器官数目的增加而升高,且差异有统计学意义。在预测住院病死率方面,MODS诊断草案总分ROC曲线下面积为0.720,标准误(SE)为0.019,P值为0.000,95%可信限为0.683~0.757;APACHEⅡROC曲线下面积为0.746,SE为0.018,P值为0.000,95%可信限为0.710~0.782。结论本课题组所建立的MODS诊断草案在预测MODS患者的住院转归方面(死亡或生存)有较好的辨别力。 Objective To compare multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) scoring system ( MODS diagnostic script) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ in predicting inhospital mortality of MODS patients. Methods This was a prospective, observational and validation cohort study. The clinical and laboratory data from 725 MODS patients were collected prospectively. APACHE Ⅱ and MODS scores were calculated and compared for predicting inhospital mortality. The areas under receiver operating (ROP) curves for APACHE Ⅱ and MODS score were calculated. Results The total inhospital mortality rate of MODS patients was 58.2%, and the mortality rate of MODS patients in intensive care unit was 55.3%. The median length of hospital stay was 16 days, and the median length of ICU stay was 8 days. The APACHE Ⅱ was 7 - 50, and its median was 22. The MODS score was 1 - 25, and its median was 9. The MODS score, APACHE Ⅱ and inhospital mortality inceased with the increase of the number of dysfunctioned organs according to MODS diagnostic script. In terms of predicting inhospital mortality , the areas under ROC for MODS score were 0. 720, standard error was 0. 019, P value was 0. 000, and 95% confidence intervals were 0. 683 -0.757. The areas under ROC for APACHE Ⅱ was 0.746, standard error was 0.018, P value was 0.000, and 95% confidence intervals were 0.710 - 0. 782. Conclusion Our MODS diagnostic script is helpful in predicting inhospital mortality.
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第8期574-578,共5页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
基金 北京市科委重大资助项目(H020920020530)北京市科技新星计划资助项目(2004A32)
关键词 多器官功能障碍综合征 诊断 预后 评分 Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome Diagnosis Prognosis Score
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1王今达.90年代多脏衰综合征:SIRS与MODS[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):324-328. 被引量:69
  • 2Marshall J C,Cook D J,Christou N V,et al.Multiple organ dysfunction score:a reli able descriptor of a complex clinical outcome[J].Crit Care Med,1995,23:1638-1652.
  • 3Bone R C,Balk R A,Cerra F B,et al.Defi nitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative th erapies in sepsis[J].Chest,1992,101(6):1644-1655.
  • 4Vincent J L,Moreno R,Takala J,et al.The SOFA(sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure[J] .Intensive Care Med,1996,22:707-710.
  • 5Hallonen K I,Pettila V,Leppaniem A K,et al.Multiple organ dysfunction ass ociated with acute pancreatitis[J].Crit Care Med,2002,30:1274-127 9
  • 6Pettila V,Pettila M,Sarna S,et al.Comparison of multiple organ dysfunctio n scores in the prediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill[J].Cri t Care Med,2002,30(8):1705-1711.
  • 7Angus D C,Linde-Zwirble W T,Lidicker J,et al.Epidemiology of s evere sepsis in the United States:analysis of incidence,outcome,and associat ed costs care[J].Crit Care Med,2001,29(7):1303-1310.
  • 8Weycker D,Akhras K S,Edelsberg J,et al.Long-term mortality and medical care charges in patients with severe sepsis[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31 (9):2316-2323.
  • 9Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, et al. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med, 1995, 23:1638- 1652.
  • 10Padkin A, Goldfrad C, Brady AR, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis occuring in the first 24 hrs in intensive care units in England, Wales, Northern Ireland. Crit Care Med, 2003, 31:2332-2338.

共引文献1842

同被引文献169

引证文献19

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部