1Browne B J, Holt C O, Emovon O E. Delayed graft function may not adversely affect short-term renal allograft outcome [ J ]. Clin Transplant, 2003, 17 (S9) :35 - 8.
2Nankivell B J, Fenton-Lee C A, Kuypers D R, et al. Effect of histological damage on long-term kidney transplant outcome [ J ].Transplantation, 2001, 71 (4) :515 -23.
3Chang G J, Mahanty H D,Vincenti F, et al. A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-CD25 mAb provides effective immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function [ J ].Clin Transplant, 2000, 14 (6) :550 -4.
3Kozakjowski N, Regele H. Biopsy diagnostics in renal allograft re-jection: from histomorpphology to biological fuction [ J ]. Trans-plant International, 2009,22(10) :945 -53.
4Solez K, Colvin R, Recusen L C,et al. Banfff05 meeting report:differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination ofchronic allograft nephropathy ( ‘ CAN ’ ) [ J ]. Am J Transplant,2007,7(3) :518 -26.
5Colvin R B. The renal allograft biopsy [ J]. Kidney Int, 1996 , 50(3):1069 -82.
6Gaber L W,Moore L W, Gaber A 0,et al. Correlation of histolo-gy to clinical rejection reversal : A thymoglobulin multicenter trialreport [J]. Kidney Int, 1999,55(6) :2415 -22.
7Fisher J S, Woodle E S,Thistlethwaite Jr J R. Kidney transplan-tation :Graft monitoring and immunosuppression [ J]. World Surg,2002,26(2) :185 -93.
8Collins A B,Schneeberger E E, Pascual M A, et al. Compiementactivation in acute humoral renal allograft rejection: diagnostic sig-nicance of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries [ J ]. J Am SocNephrol, 1999, 10(10) : 2208 -14.
