4Spira N, Bouyer J, POuly JL, et al. Fertility afterectopic pregnancy Firstresults of a population-based cohort study in France. Human Reproduee, 1996, 11: 99-104.
1Strandell A & Thorburn J. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril,1999,71(2):282-6.
2fan S,Tummon M, Nancy A, et al. Transferringmore embryo increase risk of heterotopoic pregnancy. Fertil Steril, 1994,66(5):1065-7.
3Job-Spira N, Coste J, Bouyer J, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and ectopic pregnancy?New directions for aetiological research. Hum Reprod, 1996,11(2):239-42.
4Marcus S & Brinsden P. Analysis of the incidence and risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod, 1995,10(1):199-203.
5Yovieh JL,Turner S & Murphy A. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril, 1985,44(2):318-21.
6Knutzen V, Stratton CJ, Sher G, et al. Mock embryo transfer in early luteal phase,the cycle before in vitro fertilization and bmbryo transfer: a descriptive study. Fertil Steril,1992,57(1):156-62.
7Zouves C, Erenus M & Gomel V. Tubal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer:a role for proximal occlusion or salpingectomy after failed distal tubal surgery? Fertil Steril,1991,56(4):691-5.
8Blazar A, Frishman G, Hogan J, et al. The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril,1997,67(3):517-20.
9Ng EH, Yeung WS & Ho PC. The presence of hydrosalpinx may not adversely affect the implantation and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genetic,1997,14(9):508-12.
10Wit W,Gowrising C,Kuik D, et al. Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod,1998,13(6):1696-701.
