期刊文献+

隐喻的工作机制及其恰当性分析 被引量:1

隐喻的工作机制及其恰当性分析
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文受戴维森的启发,并基于唯特根斯坦对“把…看作…”的分析,尝试提出隐喻创造相似性的工作机制以及这一机制运作如何可能的恰当件条件,并将笔者的这一理论与哈雷等提出的语义学—本体论分析进行了比较。 In this paper, I try to put forward a theory about work mechanism of metaphors and appropriate conditions, enlightened by Davidson and based on the Wittgenstein "s analysis of "see... as... ", and check my theory against Harre's semantic-ontology method.
作者 胡浩
出处 《现代哲学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期86-90,共5页 Modern Philosophy
基金 教育部人文社科项目"基于认知的科学理论和科学推理研究"的阶段性成果。
关键词 把……看作…… 隐喻性分析 类型层级 See... as... Metaphorical analysis Type-hierarchy.
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1戴维森·D.隐喻的含义[A].牟博译.载于A.P.马蒂尼奇编:语言哲学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998.
  • 2维特根斯坦·L.哲学研究[M].陈嘉映译.上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
  • 3胡浩.理论构成隐喻的指称[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(5):21-24. 被引量:6
  • 4Aronson, J. L. & Harre, R. & Way, E. C, Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible, Illinois:Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Richard Boyd. Metaphor and Theory Change[A]. In Metaphor and Thought[C] ed. A.Ortony,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.489 - 490,490,87 - 489,492,493,494,500.
  • 2Bipin Indurkhya. Metaphor and Cognition[M]. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.133.
  • 3Max Black. Metaphor[ A]. In Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor[ C] ed. M. Johnson , Minneapolis, Minn: Minnesota University Press, 1981.63-82.
  • 4Marry Hesse. Revolution and Reconstruction in the Philosophy of Science[ M]. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1980. 117.
  • 5MK穆尼茨.当代分析哲学[M].复旦大学出版社,1986.120-121.
  • 6D戴维森.隐喻的含义[A].A P 马蒂尼奇编.语言哲学[M].商务印书馆,1998.845.
  • 7K波普尔.科学发现的逻辑[M].沈阳出版社,1999,8..
  • 8Max Black. More about Metaphor [ A] . In Metaphor and Thought [ C]. ed. A. Ortony, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.30.
  • 9Rom Harre. The Principle of Scientific Thinking [ M ].Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.46 - 47,64.

共引文献5

同被引文献7

  • 1李平,李大超.基于模型推理的科学认知论题[J].哲学研究,2005(10):65-72. 被引量:5
  • 2Nancy J. Nersessian.Abstraction via generic modeling in concept formation in science[J]. Mind & Society . 2002 (1)
  • 3Nersessian N J.How do Scientists Think?Capturing theDynamics of Conceptual Change in Science. Cognitive Models of Readings:Introductory Selec-tion in Cognitive Science . 1992
  • 4Aronson J L,Harre R,Way E C.RealismRescued:how Scientific Progress is Possible. . 1995
  • 5Howson C.Scientific Reasoning:The Bayesian Approach. . 2006
  • 6Nersessian,N.J.The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. The Cognitive Basis of Science . 2002
  • 7Nersessian,N.J.,Malamant,D.Maxwell and “the Method of Physical Analogy”: Model-based reasoning, generic abstraction and conceptual change. Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics . 2002

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部