摘要
通过对CR与DR的原理分析、主要参数比较、操作使用比较、软件功能比较、设备发展前景比较以及作者通过数年的CR、DR使用经验认为:CR目前在中小型医院仍不失为较方便的数字摄影过渡设备,但医院达到大于100人/日的规模时,则必须以DR为主要摄影设备,CR只能作为辅助摄影设备。
According to the comparison of CR and DR in such aspects as principle analysis, main parameters, software operation capability and development prospects, along with our experience, it is concluded that CR is now fit for the middle and small hospitals as an expedient intergrading digital image equipment, while for the hospitals with workload of over 100 persons per day, DR should be the primary digital image equipment and CR should work as auxililiary digital image equipment.
出处
《医疗卫生装备》
CAS
2006年第7期55-55,共1页
Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
