摘要
通过Marsh筒法和净浆流动度法用于水泥与减水剂适应性测试比较发现,采用Marsh筒法无论在测定减水剂饱和掺量点、对经时损失的敏感性上,还是与水泥标准稠度用水量和胶砂流动度的相关性上都优于净浆流动度法。
The Marsh cone method was proved to be better than method for cement paste fluidity by comparative study in three aspects： the saturation content of water retarder, the sensitivity for fluidity loss and the correlativity with cement water requirement for normal consistency and mortar fluidity,
出处
《水泥》
CAS
2006年第8期1-4,共4页
Cement
