期刊文献+

产品配置设计评价模型研究 被引量:9

Research on product configuration cases evaluation model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大规模定制的核心是产品配置设计.依据客户对产品的需求信息,产品配置设计的实例往往不惟一,需要对配置结果进行评价,以选出客户最满意的产品实例.为此,以递阶层次结构建立了产品配置设计的二级评价指标体系,采用层次分析法构建了产品配置设计评价的层次结构模型.对层次结构模型建立了判断矩阵和各层元素对目标层的总排序权重向量,进行了各层总排序的一致性检验.给出了产品配置设计评价的算法流程图,解决了构造判断矩阵的有关问题,并通过一个实例验证了该评价模型的合理性和可行性. Product configuration design is the key technology of mass customization. According to customer's requirements, product configuration cases are not unique, thus the results must be evaluated to choose the most satisfied product case. Two-level evaluation index system of product configuration design is built in hierarchic structure. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to build the corresponding evaluation model. The judgement matrix and the total sequencing weight vector of each level's element to the objective level are built and the consistency check of total sequencing of each level is applied. The arithmetic flow chart of product configuration cases evaluation process is provided, which solves the problems on judgement matrix. Finally, the feasibility of the product configuration cases evaluation model is demonstrated by a typical case.
出处 《大连理工大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期510-515,共6页 Journal of Dalian University of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70471056)
关键词 评价模型 产品配置设计 大规模定制 层次分析法 evaluation model product configuration design mass customization AHP
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献25

  • 1[1]Bullinger H J, Warschat J. Concurrent Simultaneous Engineering Systems: The Way to Successful Product Development. London:Springer-Verlag London Limited, 1996
  • 2[2]Ullman D G, Herling D. Computer support for design team decisions. In: Proceedings of the 1995 Lancaster international Workshop on Engineering Design, Lancaster, UK, 1995. 27-29
  • 3[3]Liebers A, Kals H J J. Cost decision support in product design. Annals of the CIRP, 1997, 46(1):107-112
  • 4[4]Shina S G, Saigal A. Technology cost modeling for the manufacture of printed circuit boards in new electronic products. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1998, 120(5):368-375
  • 5[5]Kimura F, Hata T, Suzuki H. Product quality evaluation based on behaviour simulation of used products. Annals of the CIRP, 1998, 47(1):119-122
  • 6[6]Caporello T J, Wolfe P M. A closed-loop assessment framework for integrated product and process development implementations. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1995, 29(1—4):387-391
  • 7[2]Berge C. Graphs and Hypergraphs. North-holland :North-holland publishing company, 1973
  • 8[3]Ancona M,de floriani L. A Hypergraph-based Hierarchical Data Structure and its Applications. Adv. Eng. Software, 1989, 11(1):2~11
  • 9SUH N P. The principles of design[M]. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1990.
  • 10PAHI G, BEITZ W. Engineering design-a systematic approach[M]. London: The Design Council, 1988.

共引文献174

同被引文献52

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部