摘要
目的:探讨脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)对前庭周围性眩晕和中枢性眩晕的鉴别诊断价值。方法:对96例前庭系统性眩晕患者(研究组)及50名(100只耳)健康人(对照组)进行BAEP检查,观察两组Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波的潜伏期(PL)、波形分化情况,Ⅰ-Ⅲ、Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ-Ⅴ波的峰间潜伏期(IPL)、两耳侧间差(ILD)以及Ⅴ/Ⅰ波幅比值。对照组50名均为与研究组年龄、性别相匹配的健康人。结果:对照组Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波波形分化良好、重现性佳,各波PL及IPL均正常,Ⅱ一Ⅴ IPL〈Ⅰ~Ⅲ IPL,同侧Ⅴ/Ⅰ波幅比值大于0.5,各波PL侧差(ILD)〈0.4ms研究组96例中有68例(71%)异常。两组的PL和IPL数值进行比较存在着显著性差异(P〈0.01)。研究组68例BAEP异常者,依其表现分为两型。①内耳型28例,表现为Ⅰ波分化不良或波形消失,PL延长及其后各波相应延长,Ⅰ—ILD大于0.4ms;②脑干型40例,表现为Ⅰ波正常,Ⅲ波或Ⅴ波PL延长或波形消失,Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ—Ⅴ的IPL延长,Ⅴ/Ⅰ波幅比小于0.5及双侧Ⅴ—ILD〉0.4ms,两型之间的Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波PL及Ⅲ-Ⅴ、Ⅰ—Ⅴ的IPL存在着显著性差异(P〈0.01),而Ⅰ-Ⅲ的IPL无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。结论:BAEP是鉴别前庭系统周围性和中枢性眩晕比较敏感的诊断方法。
Objective:To explore the differential diagnostic value of brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) in patients with vestibular system peripheral or central vertigo. Methods: The BAEPs of 96 patients with vestibular vertigo and 50 health volunteers (100 ears), which used as control group, they were age- and sex - matched with those of experimental group, were detected. Meanwhile; the Peak Latency (PL) and change of waveform I. Ⅲ. Ⅴ, the interpeak latency(IPL) of waveform Ⅰ - Ⅲ, Ⅲ Ⅴ arid I - Ⅴ, the inter- ears latency difference (ILD)and amphtude ratio of wave Ⅴ/Ⅰ were observed and analyzed. Results: The BAEPs of control group showed: ①fine differentiation and good reproducibility of waveform Ⅰ . Ⅲ. Ⅴ ;②normal PL and IPL ③the IPL of wave Ⅲ - Ⅴ was less than those of Ⅰ - Ⅲ ;④the homolateral amplitude ratio of Ⅴ : Ⅰ exceed 0.5;⑤the ILD of various wave PL less than 0.4 milliseconds. However, in patients group, 68 BAEP were abnormal, the abnormality rate was 71% (68/96). Two abnormal types were classified by their characteristics, as follow: ①inner - ear type(28 cases) : showing undifferentiating or disappearance of wave Ⅰ, prolongation of PL in wave Ⅰ and accordingly extended ILD of all later waves, the ILD of waveform Ⅰ exceeded 0.4 milliseconds; ②Brain - stem type(40 cases) : showing normal wave Ⅰ, prolonged PL or waveform disappearance of waves Ⅲ or Ⅴ .The IPL of waves Ⅲ - Ⅴ and Ⅰ- Ⅲ were prolonged,and amphtude ratio of Ⅴ/Ⅰ was less than 0.5,and I LD of bilateral wave Ⅴ was more than 0.4 millisconds. The PL of wave Ⅰ. Ⅲ . Ⅴ, IPL of Ⅲ - Ⅴ. Ⅰ - Ⅴ, homolateral IPL of wave Ⅰ and Ⅴ, present significant difference between two types, oppositely, the IPL of Ⅰ- Ⅲ was not significant difference. Condusion: BAEP detection might be a more sensitive approach for differentiating vestibular system peripheral and central vertigo.
出处
《解剖与临床》
2006年第4期267-268,271,共3页
Anatomy and Clinics
关键词
前庭系统
眩晕
脑干听觉诱发电位
Vestibular nerve
Vertigo
Brainstem auditory evoked potential