期刊文献+

主体关联性对贝叶斯推理概率估计的影响 被引量:7

A Study on the Influence of Subject Relevancy on Bayesian Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 用贝叶斯推理问题为实验材料,探讨了主体关联性对贝叶斯推理概率估计的影响。结果表明,当估计的事件与主体有关时,被试对消极事件概率估计较低,对积极事件概率估计值;当估计的事件与主体无关时,被试对消极事件和积极事件的概率估计无显著差异。反应时分析表明,被试对消极事件的概率估计比对积极事件的概率估计时间显著地长,当消极事件与主体有关时概率估计时间就更长;而对积极事件的概率估计,与主体有关和与主体无关时反应时差异不显著。这表明,被试对消极事件的概率估计(特别是消极事件与己有关时)更为慎重。 Bayesian tasks were used in the present study to explore the influence of subject relevancy on Bayesian reasoning. The results showed: (1) The probability estimation was significantly lower for passive events than active events when the events in the tasks were related to the subjects; it showed no significant difference between the two conditions when the events were not related to the subjects. (2)For passive events in the tasks, the RT(response time) of probability estimation was significantly longer when the events were related to the subjects than when they were not; for active events, the RT of probability estimation showed no significant difference between the two conditions. It suggests that subjects are cautious of passive events related to themselves when they make probability estimation.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期795-797,777,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金资助(项目号:04BYY007)
关键词 贝叶斯推理 概率估计 主体关联性 Bayesian reasoning, probability estimation, subject relevancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1张向阳,刘鸣.贝叶斯推理研究综述[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(4):388-394. 被引量:13
  • 2赵晓东,傅小兰.贝叶斯推理的改进方法——以频率格式代替概率格式进行信息表征[J].心理科学,2002,25(1):96-97. 被引量:10
  • 3Tversky A.Elimination by Aspects:A Theory of Choice.Psychological Review,1972,79:281-299.
  • 4Tversky A,Kahneman D.Judgment Under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases.Science,1974,185:1124-1131.
  • 5Johnston L.Resisting Change:Information-seeking and Stereotype Change.European Journal of Social Psychology,1996,26:799-825
  • 6Pinkley R L,Griffith T L,Northcraft G B."Fixed pie" Ala mode:Information Availability,Information Processing,and The Negotiation of Suboptimal Agreements.Orgnizational Behavior and Humen Decision Processes,1995,62:101-112
  • 7Frey D.The Effect of Negative Feedback About Oneself and Cost of Information on Preferences for Information About The Source of This Feedback.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1981,17:42-50
  • 8Holton B,Pyszczynski T.Biased Information Search in The Interpersonal Domain.Journal of Experimenal Social Psychology Bulletin,1989,15:42-51
  • 9Kahneman D,Tverskey A.Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.Econometrica,1979,47:263-291
  • 10刘力,张峥,熊德华,张圣平.行为金融学与心理学[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):249-255. 被引量:28

二级参考文献39

  • 1Heath C, Tversky A. Preference and Belief: Ambiguity and Competence in Choice under Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1991, 4:5-28.
  • 2Fox C, Tversky A. Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110:585-603.
  • 3Josephs R, Larrick RP, Steele C M, Nisbett R E. Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 62:26-37.
  • 4Ritov I. Probability of regret: Anticipation of uncertainty resolution in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996, 66:228-236.
  • 5Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47:263-291.
  • 6Brad B, Odean T. Online Investors: Do the Slow Die First? Review of Financial Studies, 2002, 15:455-488.
  • 7Nicholas B, Huang M, Santos T. Prospect Theory and Assets Price. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001,116:1-53.
  • 8Kahneman D, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uneertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 1974, 185: 1124-1131.
  • 9Rabin M. Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers. Quaxtefly journal of Economics, 2002,117:775-816.
  • 10Kahneman D, Tversky A On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 1973, 80:237-251.

共引文献44

同被引文献48

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部