期刊文献+

高中生文理分科刻板印象的实验研究 被引量:8

An Experimental Study on the Stereotype of High School Students Expecting to Major in Liberal Arts or Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用2×4×2的重复测量的实验设计,探讨了性别是否会引起对于文理分科期望的刻板化加工以及刻板印象的意识性抑制问题,同时验证目前占主导地位的对范畴信息信任的减弱会增强对个体化信息的信赖这一假说。结果表明:(1)性别刻板印象会影响对文理科这种社会范畴的判断;(2)刻板印象比较顽固,较难受到意识性的抑制;(3)与刻板化信息完全相反的个体化信息的作用大于刻板化信息的作用,对刻板化信息的作用产生了一定的抑制,但无法完全抑制;(4)刻板印象与个体化信息的加工通路是平行的,同时它们彼此之间也是相互联系和限制的。 Using the experimental method , this study probed the stereotype's consciousness inhibition. We also researched whether gender could cause stereotype's process of high school students expecting to major in liberal arts or science, inhibit and even correct this kind of stereotype's trend through consciousness. Furthermore, we proved the leading hypothesis that if the trust of social category information decreases, the trust of individual information will increase. The primary material was obtained through two questionnaire investigations: first an open questionnaire; then a cosed questionnaire. The experiment design was 2 × 4 × 2. The result showed: (1) gender stereotype could influence the judgment of such social categories as arts and science. (2) the stereotype effect was deep-rooted and was hardly inhibited by consciousness; (3) the function of individual information, which is opposite to stereotype and is greater than that of stereotype, probably produced some degree of inhibition, but not all; (4) stereotypes parallel the processing of individual information, and they are related to and restricted by each other.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期991-993,共3页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 刻板印象 文理分科 个体化信息 意识性抑制 stereotype, major in liberal arts or science, individual information, conscious inhibition
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1杨治良,王沛.现代人的心理迷信-偏执心理现象分析.湖南:湖南教育出版社,1999:167-172
  • 2刘素珍,杨治良,龚佃祥,赵华.刻板印象:是否可以再分离?[J].心理学报,1998,30(3):269-273. 被引量:15
  • 3王沛.刻板印象与社会情境因果建构的相互影响[J].心理科学,2003,26(4):738-739. 被引量:8
  • 4Sechrist,G.B.,& Stangor,C.Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility.Journal of Personality and social Psychology,2001,80:645-654
  • 5Rudman,L.A.,Ashmore,R.D.& Gary,M.L."Unlearning" automatic biases:The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes.Journal of Personality & social Psychology,2001,81:856-868
  • 6于泳红.大学生内隐职业偏见和内隐职业性别刻板印象研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(4):672-675. 被引量:79
  • 7Fiske S T.Social Congition And Social Perception.Annual Review Of Psychology,1993,44:155-194
  • 8杨秀梅,叶青,廖厚才.文理分科科学、合理否.http:// www.People.com.cn/GB/guandian/27/20020126/656166.html

二级参考文献14

  • 1蔡华俭,杨治良.大学生性别自我概念的结构[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):168-174. 被引量:56
  • 2蔡华俭,周颖,史青海.内隐联想测验(IAT)及其在性别刻板印象研究中的应用[J].社会心理研究,2001(4):6-11. 被引量:36
  • 3杨治良,刘素珍,赵华,吴梦麟.内隐情感记忆实验研究Ⅰ:精神分裂症情感记忆特征[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1996,4(4):193-196. 被引量:9
  • 4Anthony G. Greenwald, Mahzarin R. Banaji. Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self - Esteem, and Stereotypes. psychological review, 1995,102( 1 ) :4 - 27.
  • 5Shelly D. Famham, Anthony G. Greenwald, Mahzarin R.Banaji. Implicit Self- Esteem. Social Identity and Social Cognition. Edited by Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A,Blackwell Publishers Inc. 1999:230 - 248.
  • 6Anthony G. Greenwald, Shelly D. Farnham. Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self - Esteem and Self-Concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000,79(6) : 1022 - 1038.
  • 7Anthony G. Greenwald, Debbie E. McGhee, and JordanL. k. Schwartz. Measuring Individual Difference in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(6):1464-1480.
  • 8时蓉华,社会心理学,1996年,379页
  • 9叶国蔚,心理学报,1994年,26卷,4期,410页
  • 10杨治良,记忆心理学,1994年,263页

共引文献92

同被引文献114

引证文献8

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部