期刊文献+

瑞波西汀与氟西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性对照研究 被引量:9

A control study on the curative effect and reliability of reboxetine with fluoxetine for treatment of depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价国产瑞波西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法采用随机、双盲双模拟、氟西汀平行对照研究,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)总分减分值作为疗效指标;药物不良反应量表(TESS)、实验室检查、生命体征等观察药物安全性。结果共收集抑郁症病人56例,瑞波西汀组(试验组)28例,氟西汀组(对照组)28例。治疗6周后,瑞波西汀组HAMD总分减分值为(16.8±5.8)分,氟西汀组为(16.0±6.3)分,与治疗前基线相比均差异有显著性(P<0.01),但2组相比差异无显著性(P>0.05);瑞波西汀组有效率(HAMD减分率≥50%)为78.6%,氟西汀组为64.3%,2组相比差异无显著性(P>0.05)。2组不良反应差异无显著性。结论甲磺酸瑞波西汀胶囊的抗抑郁疗效与氟西汀相似,不良反应轻而少,是一种有效、安全的抗抑郁药物。 Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of reboxetine in treating depression. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, double-mimicry, fluoxetine parallel controlled, the study group was treated with reboxetine capsule and the control group with fluoxetine. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression was taken to evaluate efficacy score while. Results At the end of six weekend, compared with the total scores of HAMD before and after treatment, reboxetine ( 16.8 ± 5.8) and fluoxetine ( 16.0 ± 6.3 ) group both showed the significant difference, while the difference compared between two groups ,the efficacy (78.6% and 64.3% ) for depression and side effects were no significance. Conclusion Reboxetine is a efficient and safety antidepressant.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2006年第8期721-722,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 瑞波西汀 氟西汀 抑郁症 Reboxetine Fluoxetine Depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hajos M,Fleishaker JC,Filipiak-Reisner JK,et al.Wong EH.The selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor antidepressant reboxetine:pharmacological and clinical profile.CNS Drug Rev,2004,10:23-44.
  • 2Nelson JC,Portera L,Leon AC.Are there differences in the symptoms that respond to a selective serotonin or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor? Biol Psychiatry,2005,15 ;57:1535-1542.
  • 3Messer T,Schmauss M,Lambert-Baumann J.Efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine in depressive patients treated in routine clinical practice.CNS Drugs,2005,19:43-54.
  • 4Almasi J,Rihmer ZReview of antidepressants from the TCAs to the third generation drugsNeuropsychopharmacol Hung,2004,6:185-94.
  • 5Bodlund O,Haggstrom L.SSRI resistant depression.Supplementation with noradrenergic pharmaceuticals can be a good alternative Lakartidningen,2004,101:2712-2714.
  • 6Baldwin D,Bridgman K,Buis C.Resolution of sexual dysfunction during double-blind treatment of major depression with reboxetine or paroxetine.J Psychopharmacol,2006,20:91-96.
  • 7Langworth S,Bodlund O,Agren H.Efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine compared with citalopram:a double-blind study in patients with major depressive disorder.J Clin Psychopharmacol,2006,26:121-127.
  • 8Rampello L,Alvano A,Chiechio S,et al.An evaluation of efficacy and safety of reboxetine in elderly patients affected by "retarded" post-stroke depression.A random,placebo-controlled study.Arch Gerontol Geriatr,2005,40:275-285.
  • 9肖勃,谢文娇,施壮炎,张帆,丘春柳,邱开封.万拉法新与氟西汀治疗老年抑郁症对照研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(8):703-704. 被引量:5

二级参考文献6

  • 1张明圆.精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科技出版社,1998..
  • 2Cueli TD,While C,Hackett D,et al. Effectiveness of venlafaxine in patients hospitalized for major depression and melancholia. J Clin Psychiatry,1995,56(Suppl 3) :10.
  • 3Dierick M, Ravizzal L, Realini R, et al. A double-Blind Comparison of Venlafaxine and fluoxetine for treatment of major depression in outpatients. Prog Neruopsychopharmacol. Biol Psychiatry, 1996,20:57.
  • 4Feighner JP. Mechanism of action of antidepressant medication. J Clin Psychiatry, 1999,60 Suppl 4:4-11.
  • 5张作记.行为医学量表手册[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,:118-119.
  • 6李冰,王祖新.万拉法新治疗抑郁症的临床验证[J].上海精神医学,1997,9(4):269-272. 被引量:67

共引文献4

同被引文献80

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部