期刊文献+

影响内蒙古典型草原3种牧草饱和链烷回收率的因素研究 被引量:7

A study of fecal recovery of alkanes from sheep fed on three plant species in the Inner Mongolia steppe
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2004年秋季在中国科学院内蒙古草原生态系统定位站,用不同放牧演替阶段的优势植物羊草、糙隐子草和冷蒿分别按30%、20%和50%的比例混合组成日粮,饲喂12只(39±2.1 kg)2岁羯羊(内蒙古细毛羊×蒙古羊)。试验分2个组,投喂胶囊组9只羊,每只羊投喂1粒QSM胶囊,对照组3只羊不投喂;试验期14 d内每天记录绵羊实际牧草采食量和排粪量,并收集牧草样品在45℃烘箱中烘干;粪便样品连续收集7 d,分别在45℃烘干和冷冻;利用气相色谱分析牧草和粪便样品中链烷含量,计算粪便中链烷的回收率。试验结果表明,牧草链烷含量存在物种间差异,绵羊粪便中链烷的回收率与链烷长度存在线性增加关系,烘干处理粪样的链烷回收率高于冷冻干燥处理的回收率,两者存在显著的正相关,且投喂QSM胶囊不会影响其他链烷的回收率。 An experiment to calculate the fecal recoveries of alkanes was carried out at the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in autumn 2004. Twelve wethers (Inner Mongolia fine wool sheep × Inner Mongolia sheep) selected from a group of two year olds were fed fresh mixtures of Leymus chinensis (30%), Cleistogenes squarrosa (20%) and Artemisia frigida (50%) in known proportions and amounts for 14 days. They were assigned to two groups in a randomized experimental design. Nine sheep were dosed with artificial QSM capsules (New Zealand Captec Company) and three sheep were not dosed. Samples of herbage and feces were collected daily for seven days and dried in oven at 45℃ before freeze drying for analysis of the alkane concentration by gas chromatography. The results showed that there was a different concentration of N-alkanes in the three forage species. Fecal recoveries of N-alkanes increased linearly with increasing carbon chain lengths, and were greater using oven drying than freeze drying. There was no significant effects of artificial QSM capsules on recoveries of alkanes from plant cuticular wax in sheep faeces.
出处 《草业学报》 CSCD 2006年第4期109-114,共6页 Acta Prataculturae Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划重点基金项目(90211017) 国家自然科学基金(30371019) 中国科学院知识创新工程方向性项目(KSCX2-SW-107)
关键词 饱和链烷 回收率 绵羊 内蒙古典型草原 N-alkane fecal recoveries sheep Inner Mongolia steppe
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1汪诗平.几种草食动物日粮植物组成研究技术和方法的比较[J].草业学报,1995,4(3):8-16. 被引量:14
  • 2龙瑞军,董世魁,王元素,郭轶瑞,JPAGELLA.反刍动物采食量的概念与研究方法[J].草业学报,2003,12(5):8-17. 被引量:60
  • 3John W W, Scott M, Karen L L, et al. Calibrating fecal NIRS equations for predicting botanical composition of diets [J].Journal of Range Management, 2002,55: 374-382.
  • 4肖金玉,侯扶江,于应文,常生华.链烷技术估测放牧动物牧草采食量与消化率[J].草业学报,2005,14(4):125-130. 被引量:14
  • 5Mayes R W, Lamb C S, Colgrove P M. The use of dosed and herbage N-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge, 1986,107:161-170.
  • 6Malossini F, Piasentier E, Bovolenta S. N-Alkane content of some forages[J]. Journal Science Food Agricultural, 1990,53:405-409.
  • 7Dove H. Using the N-alkanes of plant cuticular wax to estimate the species composition of herbage mixtures [J]. Journal Agricultural Research Australian,1992,43:1711-1724.
  • 8Vulich S A, O' riordan E G, H anrahan J P. Use of N-alkanes for the estimation of herbage intake in sheep, accuracy and precision of the estimates [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science,1991,116:319-323.
  • 9Mayes R W, Duncan A, Sibbald A M, et al. The use of plant N-alkanes for determining the composition of the diet of grazing herbivores[J]. Journal Agricultural Science, 1995,121:381-406.
  • 10Dove H, Moore A D. Using a least-squares optimization procedure to estimate botanical composition based on the alkanes of plant cuticular wax [J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1995,46:1535-1544.

二级参考文献104

  • 1汪诗平.几种草食动物日粮植物组成研究技术和方法的比较[J].草业学报,1995,4(3):8-16. 被引量:14
  • 2INRA. Ruminant Nutrition: Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables[M]. Paris,France: INRA and John Libbey Eurotext, 1989.
  • 3Wahed R A, Owen E. Comparison of sheep and goats under stall-feeding conditions: Roughage intake and selection[J].Animal Production, 1986,42 : 89-95.
  • 4Wahed R A, Owen E, Naate M, et al. Feeding straw to small ruminants: Effect of amount offered on intake and selection of barley straw by goats and sheep[J]. Animal Production, 1990,51:283-289.
  • 5National Research Council. Predicting Feed Intake of Food-Producing Animals[M]. Washington D.C. , USA: National Academy of Sciences, 1986.
  • 6Varga O A, Harpster H W. Gut size and rate of passage[A]. In:Symposium: Intake by Feedlot Cattle[M]. Stillwater,Oklahoma, USA: Oklahoma State University,1995.85-95.
  • 7Weston R H, Poppi D P. Comparative aspects of food intake[A]. In: Hacker J B, Ternouth J H. The Nutrition of Herbivores[M]. Sydney, Australia : Academic Press, 1987.133-161.
  • 8Van Es A J H. Which information on feeds is most needed in practical livestock feeding? [A]. In:Robards G E, Packham R G. Feed Information and Animal Production[M]. Farnham Royal, Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux and Feed and International Network of Feed Information Centres, 1983. 115-118.
  • 9McDonald P, Edwards R A, Greenhalgh J F D, et al. Animal Nutrition[M]. Fifth Edition. Essex, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1995.
  • 10Poppi D P, Hughes T P, L'Huillier P J. Intake of pasture by grazing ruminants[A]. In: Nicol A M. Livestock Feeding on Pasture[M]. Hamilton, New Zealand : New Zealand Society of Animal Production,1987. 55-63.

共引文献77

同被引文献202

引证文献7

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部