期刊文献+

A comparison of the RCM and ISC3 dispersion models against the Alaska data set

A comparison of the RCM and ISC3 dispersion models against the Alaska data set
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) approved ISC3 for short-range dispersion modeling. The regulatory model of China is a traditional Gaussian plume model similar to ISC. This paper demonstrates the advantages of ISC3 over the regulatory model of China by comparing their predicted ground level concentrations (GLC) along downwind distance to the Alaska tracer field data. The field experiment features buoyant release of effluent at elevated height over a flat terrain and local flows influenced by building downwash. ISC3 shows much better space-time correlation and probability distribution than the China regulatory model, which frequently underestimates the GLC for effluent released with significant plume rise under stable atmospheric conditions. The performance of ISC3 is greatly enhanced by incorporating the state-of-the-art knowledge of boundary layer meteorology. In particular, ISC3 employs the PRIME model for building downwash. The USEPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency) approved ISC3 for short-range dispersion modeling. The regulatory model of China is a traditional Gaussian plume model similar to ISC. This paper demonstrates the advantages of ISC3 over the regulatory model of China by comparing their predicted ground level concentrations (GLC) along downwind distance to the Alaska tracer field data. The field experiment features buoyant release of effluent at elevated height over a flat terrain and local flows influenced by building downwash. ISC3 shows much better space-time correlation and probability distribution than the China regulatory model, which frequently underestimates the GLC for effluent released with significant plume rise under stable atmospheric conditions. The performance of ISC3 is greatly enhanced by incorporating the state-of-the-art knowledge of boundary layer meteorology. In particular, ISC3 employs the PRIME model for building downwash.
出处 《Chinese Journal Of Geochemistry》 EI CAS 2006年第3期255-257,共3页 中国地球化学学报
基金 ThisresearchwassupportedbyCSTC(No.2005AC7097).
关键词 阿拉斯加州 色散 ISC3 RCM 空气 ISC3 China regulatory model (CRM) GLC
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1SchulmanL.L,StrimaitisD.G,ScireJ.S.DevelopmentandevaluationofthePRIMEplumeriseandbuildingdownwashmodel[].JournalofAirandWasteManagementAssociation.1998
  • 2SEPA.TechnicalGuidelinesforEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentofP.R.China—AirEnvironment. HJ/T2.2-9 . 1993
  • 3NingboEnvironmentalScienceAcademy.UserGuidelinesforEnvi-ronmentalImpactAssessmentAssistant(EIAA).Ver2.5[]..1996
  • 4SchulmanL.L,StrimaitisD.G,ScireJ.S.AddendumtoISC3User’’sGuide,thePRIMEPlumeRiseandBuildingDownwashModel[]..1997
  • 5USEPA.User’’sGuidefortheIndustrialSourceComplex(ISC3)DispersionModels,VolumeⅠ—UserInstructions[]..1995
  • 6USEPA.User’’sGuidefortheIndustrialSourceComplex(ISC3)DispersionModels,VolumeⅡ—DescriptionofModelAlgorithms[]..1995
  • 7USEPA.EvaluationDatabaseforISC3[]..2004
  • 8User’s Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model—AERMOD . 2002

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部