对皇甫谧《帝王世纪》的再评价——以《帝王世纪》对几个重要地望的臆断为例

On Reevaluation of Di Wang Shi Ji by Huangpu Mi——With the example of the supposition on several important locations in Di Wang Shi Ji

西晋学者皇甫谧的治学态度不够严谨,其史学代表作《帝王世纪》对于几个重要地望的判断,往往出于主观臆测。该书曾首创四种禹都新说,皆被后世学者认为不可靠;该书首倡的契始封于“上洛商”说没有任何依据;该书所主张的汤都南亳及西亳“首阳亭”说也被考古学界所否定。他的《帝王世纪》并非“博而有据,足资考稽”之作。

HuangPu Mi, the scholar of Xijin Dynasty, was not rigorous in his research, the judgements about several old capitals＇ locations were based on supposition in his historical representive work Di Wang Shi Ji. The four original ideals on Yu＇s capital were all considered unreliable by later scholars. There was no base about Xie in ＂Shangluoshang＂ , and his idea about Tang＇s capital in Nanbo and Xibo ＂Shangyangting＂ was denied in archaeological field. His work Di Wang Shi Ji was not one with ＂sufficient reference and rich content＂.