期刊文献+

可变锥度镍钛锉在树脂弯曲根管中成形效果的观察 被引量:12

Shaping Ability of Multi-taper Nickel-titanium Files in Simulated Resin Curved Root Canal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不锈钢K型锉与可变锥度ProTaper镍钛锉在仿制树脂弯曲根管中的成形效果。方法将30个仿制树脂根管随机分为3组,分别使用不锈钢K型锉、手用ProTaper锉、机用ProTaper锉预备,记录预备后根管全长内外侧树脂去除量、预备后根管宽度、根管弯曲度变化、根管偏移。结果与不锈钢K型锉相比,手用和机用ProTaper锉预备后的根管在根尖外侧和弯曲起始部内侧的树脂去除量较少(P<0.05),根管直化度较小(P<0.05),无明显根管偏移。结论ProTaper锉成形效果优于不锈钢K型锉,预备后能形成一个与原形相似、流畅的锥形根管。 Objective To compare the shaping ability of ISO standard stainless steel K files and multi-taper ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin curved root canals. Methods Thirty simulated resin root canals were randomly divided into three groups and prepared by stainless steel K files, hand ProTaper, rotary ProTaper, respectively. The amount of material removed from inner and outer wall and canal width after canal preparation was measured, while the canal curvature before and after canal preparation and canals aberrations were recorded. Results The stainless steel K files removed more material than hand ProTaper and rotary ProTaper at the outer side of apex and inner side of curvature (P〈0.05). The mean degree of straightening in stainless steel K files group was significantly bigger than in ProTaper group(P〈0.05). The canals prepared by ProTaper had no evident aberration. Conclusion The shaping ability of ProTaper is better than stainless steel K files.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期339-342,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 国家"十五"科技攻关课题资助项目(2004BA720A23) 卫生部临床学科重点建设资助项目[卫(2004-468号)]
关键词 ProTaper锉 不锈钢K型锉 根管预备 仿制树脂根管 ProTaper stainless steel K file canal preparation simulated resin root canal
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bergmans L, Cleynenbreugel JV, Beullens M, et al. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments[J]. Int Endod J, 2003, 36 (4) : 288-295.
  • 2Veltri M, Mollo A, Pini PP, et al. In vitro comparison of shaping abihfies of ProTaper and GT rotary files[J]. J Endod, 2004,30(3) : 163-166.
  • 3Schneider S. A comparision of canal preparation in straight and curved root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1971, 32(2) : 271-275.
  • 4Alodeh MHA, Dummer PMH. A comparision of the ability of K-file and Hedstron files to shape simulated root canals in resin blocks[J]. Int Endod J, 1989, 22(3):226-235.
  • 5Calberson FLG, Deroose CAJG, Hommez GMG, et al. Shapinga bility of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals[J]. Int Ended J, 2004, 37(9):613-623.
  • 6Yun H, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 95 (2):228-233.
  • 7Paque F, Musch U, Hulsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments[J].Int Endod J, 2005, 38 (1):8-16.
  • 8朱亚琴,顾迎新,杜嵘.三种器械预备磨牙弯曲根管成形能力的比较[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2005,23(5):393-396. 被引量:10
  • 9Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Truitt JE. K3 end, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: Breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars[J]. J Endod, 2004, 30(4):234-237.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography[J]. J Endod, 1996, 22(7): 369-375.
  • 2Wildey WL, Senia ES. A new root canal instrument and instrumentation technique: A preliminary report[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1989, 67(2): 198-207.
  • 3Barbakow F, Lutz F. The 'Lightspeed' preparation technique evaluated by Swiss clinicians after attending continuing education courses[J]. Int Endod J, 1997, 30(1): 46-50.
  • 4Kuhn G, Jordan L. Fatigue and mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments[J]. J Endod, 2002, 28(10): 716-720.
  • 5Ruddle C. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. Pathways of the pulp[M]. 8th ed. St Louis, USA: The C. V. Mosby Company, 2002: 231-291.
  • 6Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971, 32(2):271-275.
  • 7Camps J, Pertot WJ. Torsional and stiffness properties of Canal Master U stainless steel and nitinol instruments[J]. J Endod, 1994, 20(8): 395-398.
  • 8Coleman CL, Svec TA. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals[J]. J Endod, 1997, 23(4): 232-235.
  • 9Walia H, Costas J, Brantley W, et al. Torsional ductility and cutting efficiency of the nitinol file[J]. J Endod, 1989, 15(4): 174.
  • 10范兵,樊明文,边专,吴民凯,P.R.Wesselink.根管偏移对充填材料封闭根管能力的影响[J].口腔医学纵横,2001,17(2):83-87. 被引量:62

共引文献9

同被引文献84

引证文献12

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部