期刊文献+

纯粹利己主义反思与经济学方法论的二重性 被引量:3

Reflection on Pure Self-interest and Dualism of Economics Methodology
原文传递
导出
摘要 对纯粹利己主义假设的批评在经济学中早有传统,但系统地拒绝纯粹利己主义的证据来自近年来的实验经济研究。另一方面,纯粹利己主义的悖论表明,对人类行为动机的考察应该将道德、规范乃至利他纳入考虑,但这种考虑又会动摇经济学的利己假设基础。事实上,我们应该承认经济学方法论的二重性,将经济理论划分为标准的经济理论和描述性的经济理论,前者不必考虑道德和规范等因素,而后者则需要考虑这些因素。 Based on experiments research evidences and theoretical logic, this paper tries to rethink the pure self-interest assumption in economics and discuss how to deal with the problem of pure self-interest assumption in economics (studying). The paper point out that. the dualism of economics (study) methodology should be recognized, and economic theory should be dividend into standard economic theory and descriptive economic theory. Standard economic theory only needs to hold the pure self-interest assumption and the descriptive economic theory often needs to consider the social preferences such as moral and norm. This paper also addresses the basic of knowledge tradition of these partitions, and its important value for some academic disputations and realistic problems.
作者 董志强
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第8期81-85,共5页 Academic Monthly
关键词 利己主义 经济学方法论 道德 实验经济 self-interest, economics methodology, morality, experimental economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Becket, G. S. A Theory of Social Interactions, Journal of Political Economy, 1974(82):1063-1093.
  • 2Selten, R. The Equity Principle in Economic Behavior, in Thoory Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice, D. Reidd Publishing Company, 1978:289-301.
  • 3Arrow, Krmeth J. Optimal and Voluntary Income Redistribution, in S. Roserfield(ed.), Economic Welfare and the Economies of Soviet Socialism: Essays in Honor of Abram Bergson, Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • 4Samudson, Paul A. Altruism ada Problem Involving Group versus Individual Selection in Economics and Biology, American Econormic Review, 1983(83):143-148.
  • 5Sen, Amartya, Moral Codes and Economic Success, Edward Eldar Press, 1996.
  • 6Roth, A., Bargaining Experiments, in J. Kagel and A. Roth (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economies,Princeton: Princeton University Preas, 1995.
  • 7Camerer, C and R.Thaler, Ultimatum, Dictators, and Manners, Journal of Economic Perspectives 1995, 9, 209-219.
  • 8Guth, W. On Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: a Personal Renew, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1997(27):329-344.
  • 9Thaler, R. H.,Anomalies: the Ultimatum Game, Journal of Economic Perspectives,1988, 2: 195-206.
  • 10Eckel, C. and P. Grossman, Are Women Less Selfish Than Men? Evidence from Dictator Experiments, Economic Journal, 1998(108),726-735.

共引文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部