期刊文献+

产超广谱β-内酰胺酶AmpC细菌感染及耐药特性 被引量:1

Produing extended-spectrum β-lactamases and AmpCβ-lactamases strains: detection infection and resistance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]了解医院内产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)和高产AmpC细菌感染和耐药特性。[方法]三维试验检测高产AmpC细菌、双纸片协同试验检测产ESBLs菌。Kirby-Bauer法测定药物敏感试验,回顾患者临床资料及使用抗生素情况。[结果]高产AmpC细菌在阴沟肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌分别为12.8%(11/89)、4.1%(7/170)和2.6%(5/190);产ESBLs菌分别为42.7%(38/89),肺炎克雷伯菌31.7%(54/170),大肠埃希菌27.3%(52/190),其中同时产两种酶为6株。高产AmpC和产ESBLs菌对三代头孢菌素,氨曲南的耐药性明显高于非产酶菌,对泰能均敏感。前者对四代头孢敏感但对酶抑制剂耐药。高产AmpC和产ESBLs菌感染与使用三代头孢有关。[结论]高产AmpC和产ESBLs是临床G-菌耐药的重要机制,其产生与使用三代头孢有关。 [ Objective] To investigate the infecting cause and antibiotic resistanceof producing extended- spectrum β- lactamases (ESBLs)and AmpCβ- lactamases bacteria in hospital. [ Methods] Producing ESBLs bacteria and AmpCβ - lactamases bacteria were detected by double- disk synergy and three - dimensional tests respectively. The antibiotic Susceptibility test was assayed by Kirby - Bauer. [Results] The incidence of AmpC- lactamases in E. Colacae. K.pneumoniae and E.coli was 12.8%(11/89),4.1%(7/ 170) and 2.6%(5/190)respectively. The incidence of ESBLs in of E. Colacae. K. pneumoniae and E. coli was 42.7% (38/89), 31.7 % (54/170) and 27.3% (52/190) respectively. AmpCβ-lactamases combined with ESBLs producing strains were found in 6 strains. Most producing ESBLs bacteria came from the patients treated with the third- generation cephalosporins. The resistance for cephalosporins and Aztreonarn in producing ESBLs and AmpCβ- lactamases strains was significantly higher than that of no producing ESBLs. The infection caused by producing ESBLs bacteria was sturbborn and ready to relapse. [ Conclusion] The production of ES- BLs, AmpCβ- lactamases strains were related with using the third- generation cephalosporins. And they lay the sasis of critical mechanism of Gram - negative bacteria, s drug - resistance.
出处 《大连医科大学学报》 CAS 2006年第4期331-332,共2页 Journal of Dalian Medical University
关键词 AMPC ESBLS G^-菌 耐药性 AmpCβ - lactamases ESBLs Gram - negative bacteria drug resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1Wiedemann B, Dietz H, Pfeifle D. Induction of β-lactamase in Enterobacter cloacae[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1998, 27(Suppl 1): S42-47.
  • 2Ehrhardt AF, Sanders CC, Romero JR et al. Sequencing and analysis of four new Enterobacter ampD alleles[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1996, 40(8): 1953-1956.
  • 3Stapleton P, Shannon K, Phillips I. DNA sequence differences of ampD mutants of Citrobacter freundii[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1995, 39(11): 2494-2498.
  • 4Matthew M, Harris AM, Marshall MJ, et al. The use of analytical isoelectric focusing for detection and identification of β-lactamases[J]. J Gen Microbiol, 1975, 88:169-178.
  • 5Stapleton P, Shannon K, Phillips I. The ability of β-lactamse antibitics to select mutants with derepressed β-lactamase synthesis from Citrobacter freundii[J]. J Antimicrobial Chemother, 1995, 36:483-496.
  • 6Kopp U, Wiedemann B, Lindquist S et al. Sequences of wild-type and mutant ampD genes of Citrobacter freundii and Enterobacter cloacae[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1993, 37(2): 224-228.
  • 7Bennett PM, Chopra I. Molecular basis of β-lactamase induction in bacteria[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1993, 37(2): 153-158.
  • 8Korfmann G, Sanders CC, Moland ES. Alterd phenotypes associated with ampD mutations in E. cloacae[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1991, 35(2): 358-364.

共引文献36

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部