论科技风险的产生与治理被引量：18

On the formation and governance of technological risk

下载PDF

导出

摘要现代社会的风险主要源自科技发展副作用所导致的科技风险。科技风险是科技政策研究所不可回避的重要问题。这一问题产生的根源在于科学理性与社会理性的断裂。近年来出现的一种所谓的科技风险民主治理模式已经为解决这一问题提供了一个新的有效途径,而遵循公众参与性、共识性及民主规范性则是现代社会科技风险民主治理的基本原则。 Technological risk, which is caused by side-effect of science and technology development, becomes the mostly issue source of modern society risk. Ruptured between scientific rationality and social rationality is not only the source of technological risk issue of modern society but also the reason of risk governance crises. Democratic governance model is a new attempt to resolve the governance crises. The basic principles of democratic governance are public participation principle, consensus principle and normative principle of deliberative democracy.

作者许志晋毛宝铭

机构地区吉林大学哲学社会学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期488-491,共4页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家社会科学基金资助项目(05BZX027) 吉林省社会科学基金资助项目(2004067) 吉林省软科学项目(20050601-2)

关键词科技风险根源治理 technological risk formation governance

分类号 G301 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1乌尔里希.贝克,王武龙.从工业社会到风险社会(上篇)——关于人类生存、社会结构和生态启蒙等问题的思考[J].马克思主义与现实,2003,55(3):26-45. 被引量：530
2乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].南京:译林出版社,2004.190,67.
3英国皇家学会.公众理解科学[R].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2004.5.
4Evans G,Durant J.The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science[J].Public Understanding of Science,1995:57-74.
5Brain W.Risk and social learning:Reification to engagement[A].Krimsky S,Golding D.Social Theories of Risk[C].London:Praeger,1992.275-297.
6Danish Board of Technology.Consensus conference[EB/OL].http://www.tekno.dk/subpage.php3? article = 468&toppic= kategori12&language= uk,2005 -06-07/2005-09-13.
7Loka Institute.Danish-style citizen-based deliberative"consensus conferences" on science & technology policy worldwide[EB/OL].http://www.loka.org/pages/woldpanels.htm,2004-10-14/2005-09-13.
8Fearon J D.Deliberation as discussion[A].Elster J.Deliberative Democracy[C].New York:Cambridge University Press,1998.44-68.
9陈家刚.协商民主引论[J].马克思主义与现实,2004,56(3):26-34. 被引量：333

二级参考文献33

1Joaeph M. Bessette, "Deliberative Democracy : The Majority Principle in Republican Govemment", in How Demo-cralic Is the Constitution? eds. Robert A. Goldwin and William A. Schambra, Washington : American Enterprise Institute, 1980.P. 102 - 116.
2Bernard Manin, On Legitimacy and Pditical Deliberation, Political Theory. 1987, 15:338 - 368; Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democrafic Legitimacy, Alan Hamllin and Philip Pettit eds. The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.P17- 34.
3Jon Elster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.6.3.
4Jon FAster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.44.
5Maeve Cooke, Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies, 2000, Vol,48,P.947 - 969.
6David Miller, Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups? Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives, Edited by Maurizio Pasaerin D' entreves, Manchester University Press, 2002. P.201.
7Carolyn Hendriks, The Ambiguous Role of Civil Society in Deliberative Democracy, Refereed Paper Presented to the Jubilee Conference of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Australian National University, Canberra, October 2002.
8Christian Hunold,Corporalism, Pluralism and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 14, No. 2, Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
9Jorge M. Valadez, Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimaey, and Self- Democracy in Multicultural Societies, USA Westview Press, 2001. P. 30.
10Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy, Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, The MIT press, 1997. P. 67.