期刊文献+

The Relationship between Magnetic Gradient and Magnetic Shear in Five Super Active Regions Producing Great Flares 被引量:2

The Relationship between Magnetic Gradient and Magnetic Shear in Five Super Active Regions Producing Great Flares
下载PDF
导出
摘要 We study the magnetic structure of five well-known active regions that produced great flares (X5 or larger). The six flares under investigation are the X12 flare on 1991 June 9 in AR 6659, the X5.7 flare on 2000 July 14 in AR 9077, the X5.6 flare on 2001 April 6 in AR 9415, the X5.3 flare on 2001 August 25 in AR 9591, the X17 flare on 2003 October 28 and the X10 flare on 2003 October 29, both in AR 10486. The last five events had corresponding LASCO observations and were all associated with Halo CMEs. We analyzed vector magnetograms from Big Bear Solar Observatory, Huairou Solar Observing Station, Marshall Space Flight Center and Mees Solar Observatory. In particular, we studied the magnetic gradient derived from line-of-sight magnetograms and magnetic shear derived from vector magnetograms, and found an apparent correlation between these two parameters at a level of about 90%. We found that the magnetic gradient could be a better proxy than the shear for predicting where a major flare might occur: all six flares occurred in neutral lines with maximum gradient. The mean gradient of the flaring neutral lines ranges from 0.14 to 0.50 G km^-1, 2.3 to 8 times the average value for all the neutral lines in the active regions. If we use magnetic shear as the proxy, the flaring neutral line in at least one, possibly two, of the six events would be mis-identified. We study the magnetic structure of five well-known active regions that produced great flares (X5 or larger). The six flares under investigation are the X12 flare on 1991 June 9 in AR 6659, the X5.7 flare on 2000 July 14 in AR 9077, the X5.6 flare on 2001 April 6 in AR 9415, the X5.3 flare on 2001 August 25 in AR 9591, the X17 flare on 2003 October 28 and the X10 flare on 2003 October 29, both in AR 10486. The last five events had corresponding LASCO observations and were all associated with Halo CMEs. We analyzed vector magnetograms from Big Bear Solar Observatory, Huairou Solar Observing Station, Marshall Space Flight Center and Mees Solar Observatory. In particular, we studied the magnetic gradient derived from line-of-sight magnetograms and magnetic shear derived from vector magnetograms, and found an apparent correlation between these two parameters at a level of about 90%. We found that the magnetic gradient could be a better proxy than the shear for predicting where a major flare might occur: all six flares occurred in neutral lines with maximum gradient. The mean gradient of the flaring neutral lines ranges from 0.14 to 0.50 G km^-1, 2.3 to 8 times the average value for all the neutral lines in the active regions. If we use magnetic shear as the proxy, the flaring neutral line in at least one, possibly two, of the six events would be mis-identified.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics》 CSCD 2006年第4期477-488,共12页 中国天文和天体物理学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
关键词 Sun: activity -- Sun: flares -- Sun: magnetic fields -- Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Sun: activity -- Sun: flares -- Sun: magnetic fields -- Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Ai G.,1987,Pub.Beijing Astron.Obs.,9,27
  • 2Deng Y.,Wang J.,Yan Y.,Zhang J.,2001,Sol.Phys.,204,11
  • 3Falconer D.A.,2001,JGR,106,25185
  • 4Falconer D.A.,Moore R.L.,Gary G.A.,2003,JGR,108,SSH11
  • 5Fletcher L.,Hudson H.S.,2001,Sol.Phys.,204,69
  • 6Gallagher P.T.,Moon Y.J.,Wang H.,2002,Sol.Phys.,209,171
  • 7Hagyard M.J.,Smith J.B.Jr.,Teuber D.,West E.A.,1984,Sol.Phys.,91,115
  • 8Kosovichev A.G.,Zharkova V.V.,2001,ApJ,550,L105
  • 9LaBonte B.J.,Mickey D.L.,Leka K.D.,1999,Sol.Phys.,189,1
  • 10Li H.,2002,ChJAA,2,174

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部