期刊文献+

基于试验数据的焊缝试样C^*参量估算 被引量:1

METHODS OF ESTIMATING C^* PARAMETER BASED ON EXPERIMENTAL DATA FOR WELD SEAM SPECIMENS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对焊缝和母材蠕变性能不相同的带焊缝CT试样,提出了一个等效均质材料模型,建立了焊缝中心裂纹、焊缝界面裂纹和非对称焊缝裂纹情况下由试验数据确定C^*参量的修正式。采用ABAQUS软件进行了带焊缝CT试样,参量的有限元分析。有限元数值解与修正式的预测值比较表明:与均质材料CT试样相比,低匹配焊缝会导致CT试样的ηw因子增大,高匹配焊缝会导致ηw因子值降低,采用ASTM E1457提供的公式在低匹配情况下会过低估算C^*参量,在高匹配情况下会过高估算C^*参量。无论是低匹配(M<1)焊缝还是高匹配(M〉1)焊缝,修正后CT试样的C^*参量计算式都可给出与有限元解非常接近的估算结果,可用于焊缝蠕变裂纹行为预测。 An equivalent homogenous model is presented for the compact tension (CT) specimen with different creep properties in the weld and base metals. Based on the proposed equivalent material model, the modified experimental C^* integral estimation equations are derived for the CT specimens with a weld centre crack, a fusion line crack and an asymmetric crack, respectively. And then, finite element (FE) analyses for C^* integral of welded CT specimens are performed by using the ABAQUS software. The C^* parameters from FE simulation and the modified estimation equations are compared. Results indicated that an under-mismatched weld will increase the non-dimensional factor ηw while an over-mismatched weld will decrease the ηw value compared with the η0 factor of homogeneous CT specimens. It implicates that the current C^* estimation equation in ASTM E1457 may underestimate C^* for an under-mismatched weld but slightly overestimate it for an over-mismatched weld. Whether for under-mismatched weld (M〈1) or for over-mismatched weld (M〉1) considered herein, the predicted C^* parameters from the presented formulae are very close to FE results and thus can be used to interpret the creep crack growth of weldments .
出处 《机械工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第8期195-200,共6页 Journal of Mechanical Engineering
基金 上海市自然科学基金(03ZR14022) 国家杰出青年基金(50225517) 上海市启明星计划(05QMX1416)资助项目
关键词 材料不匹配 焊缝 蠕变裂纹扩展 CT试样 C^*参量 Material mismatch Weldseam Creep crack growth CT specimen C^* parameter
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1TU S T,YOON K B.The influence of material mis-match on the evaluation of time-dependent fracture mechanics parameters[J].Engng.Fract.Mech,1999,64:765-780.
  • 2SEGLE P,ANDERSSON P,SAMUELSON L A.Numerical investigation of creep crack growth in cross-weld CT specimens.Part Ⅰ:Influence of mismatch in creep deformation properties and notch tip location[J].Fatigue Engng.Mater.Struct,2000,23:521-531.
  • 3BUDDEN P J,CURBISHLEY I.Assessment of creep crack growth in dissimilar metal welds[J].Nucl.Engng.Design,2000,197:13-23.
  • 4ASSIRE A,MICHEL B,RAOUS M.Creep crack initiation and creep crack growth assessments in welded structures[J].Nucl.Engng.Design,2001,206:45-56.
  • 5XUAN F Z,TU S T,WANG Z D.C^* estimation for cracks in mismatched welds and finite element validation[J].Int.J.Fract,2004,126(3):267-280.
  • 6ASTM Standard E1457-00.Standard test methods for measurement of creep crack growth rates in metals[S].Annual Book of ASTM Standards,American Society of Testing and Materials,Philadelphia,PA,USA,2000:944-957.
  • 7HARPER M P,ELLISON E G.The use of the C*parameter in predicting creep crack propagation rates[J].J.Strain Anal,1977,12:167-179.
  • 8SHAROBEAM M H,LANDES J D.The separation criterion and methodology in ductile fracture mechanics[J].Int.J.Fract,1991,47:81-104.
  • 9CLARKE G A,LANDES J D.Evaluation of the J integral for the compact specimen[J].J.Testing Evaluation,1979,7(5):264-269.
  • 10ZHANG J X,SHI Y W,TU M J.Studies on the fracture mechanics parameters of weldment with mechanical heterogeneity[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1989,34(5/6):1 041-1 050.

同被引文献20

  • 1轩福贞,涂善东,王正东.基于TDFAD的高温缺陷"三级"评定方法[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(12):222-226. 被引量:7
  • 2XuanFuzhen TuShandong WangZhengdong.TDFAD APPROACH TO HIGH TEMPERATURE DEFECT ASSESSMENT AND ITS ENGINEERING APPLICATION[J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2004,17(4):537-542. 被引量:4
  • 3轩福贞,涂善东,王正东.含裂纹结构时间相关的疲劳断裂理论与剩余寿命评价技术[J].力学进展,2005,35(3):391-403. 被引量:16
  • 4Association des. femmes commereantes et. entrepreneurs du Niger(AF- CEN). RCC-MR Design and construction rules for mechanical components of FBR nuclear islands[ S]. Paris: Association des. femmes commercantes et. entrepreneurs du Niger(AFCEN), 2002: 20-156.
  • 5Wakai T, Poussard C, Drubay B. A comparison between Japanese and French A16 defect assessment procedures for creep-fatigue crack growth [ J ]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2003, 224 (3) : 245-252.
  • 6国家质量技术监督局.GB/T1%24--2004在役含缺陷压力容器安全评定[s].北京:国家质量技术监督局,2005:1-56.
  • 7Wiesner C S, Maddox S J, Xu W, et al. Engineering critical analyses to BS7910- the UK guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures [ J ]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2000, 77(14): 883-893.
  • 8Moulin D, Drubay B, Laiarinandrasana L. A synthesis of the fracture assessrnent methods proposed in the French RCC-MR code for high temperature[J]. WRC Bulletin440, 1999: 1-107.
  • 9Dmbay B, Marie S, Chapuliot S, Lacrire M H, Michel B, Deschanels H. A16: guide for defect assessment at elevated temperature[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2003, 80: 499-516.
  • 10British Standards Institution. PD6539: 1994: Guide to methods for the assessment of the influence of crack growth on the significance of defects in components operating at high temperatures[ S]. London: British Standards Institution, 1994: 20-55.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部