期刊文献+

专利丛林、专利组合和专利联盟——从专利战略到专利群战略 被引量:64

Patent Thicket,Patent Portfolios and Patent Alliance——From Patent Strategy to Patent Cluster Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 垄断与创新,这个专利系统不得不面临的悖论难题使专利的专用权存在时空范围.这一特征在以复杂产品系统和累积创新为特征的高科技产业里造成专利丛林现象和互补性问题,从而限制了竞争和创新.为弥补单个专利专有权有限性的缺陷,应对“专利丛林现象”,避免侵权诉讼,确保专利设计自由,越来越多的企业将关注的焦点从单个专利转移到专利群上,积极实施专利组合战略和专利联盟战略. Monopolization and innovation, which patent system has to face the paradox difficult problem, make the exclusive right of the patent has the space and time scope. This characteristic causes the patent thicket and the complementarities of patent in the high-tech industry with complex product system and accumulation innovation, then limits the competition and innovation. In order to make up the limitation of the exclusive rights of patent, solve the problem of "patent thicket", avoid the infringement lawsuit and assure the freedom of design, more and more enterprises move their focus from the single patent to the patent cluster, implement the strategy of patent portfolios and patent alliance actively.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期83-89,共7页 R&D Management
基金 国家社科基金项目"跨国公司制造业和服务业外包发展趋势与我国政策研究"(04BJY003) 湖北省专利发展基金项目"半导体照明芯片制造技术的专利分析及专利战略研究"
关键词 专利丛林 专利组合 专利集中许可 专利联盟 patent thicket patent portfolios patent pooling arrangement patent alliance
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Arrow K J.Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions[A].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1962.
  • 2Scherer F M.Nordhaus' theory of optimal patent life:A geometric reinterpretation[J].American Economic Review,1972,62:422-427.
  • 3Langinier C,Moschini G.The economics of patents:An overview[R].Iowa:Iowa State University Working Paper 02-WP 293,2002.
  • 4Pitkethly R H.Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies:Patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities[J].Research Policy,2001,30:425-442.
  • 5Nordhaus W D.Inventions growth and welfare:A theoretical treatment of technological change[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1969.
  • 6Merges R P,Nelson R R.On the complex economics of patent scope[J].Columbia Law Review of Economic Studies,1990,90 (4):839-916.
  • 7Gilbert R,Shapiro C.Optimal patent length and breadth[J].RAND Journal of Economics,1990,21(1):106-112.
  • 8Dijk V T.Patent height and competition in product improvements[J].Journal of Industrial Economics,1996,44:151-167.
  • 9la Manna M.Optimal patent life vs optimal patentability standard[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,1992,10:81-90.
  • 10Shapiro C.Navigating the patent thicket:Cross licenses,patent pools,and standard setting[A].Massachusetts:MIT Press,2001.

二级参考文献40

  • 1Levin, R C, A K Klevoriek, R R Nelson, and S G Winter. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development[R]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987, (3):783-820.
  • 2Kortum, S and J Lemer. Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting?[R]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1998,48: 247-304.
  • 3Long C. Patent signals[J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 2002,69:625-679.
  • 4Cohen Met al. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U S manufacturing firms patent (or not) [DB]. NBER Working Papers, http://www, nber. org/papers/w7552, 2004/12/12.
  • 5Griliehes Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey[J]. Journal of Economic Literature , 1990,28:1661-1662.
  • 6Alchian A A and H Demsetz. Production, information costs, and economic organization[J]. American Economic Review,1972,62:777-780.
  • 7F M Scherer. The innovation lottery[A]. Rochelle Dreyfuss et al. Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: innovation policy for the knowledge soeiety[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2001:3-11.
  • 8Wagner P R and G Parehomovsky. Patent portfoliosl[DB]. SSRN Working Papers, http://ssrn, com/abstraet=582201,2004/12/12.
  • 9IBronwyn H H and R H Ziedonis. The patent paradox revisited:an empirical study of patenting in the U S semiconductor industry, 1979-1995[J]. RAND Journal of Economies, 2001,32 : 101- 125.
  • 10Merges, R P. Contracting into liability rules:intellectual property rights and collective rights organizations[J]. California Law Review, 1996, 84(5) : 1293-1393.

共引文献131

同被引文献954

引证文献64

二级引证文献393

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部