期刊文献+

木屑在鼓泡流化床和循环流化床中气化特性的对比研究 被引量:5

Comparison of sawdust gasification in bubbling fluidized bed gasifier and circulating fluidized bed gasifier
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对木屑在内径分别为0.3 m×0.3 m的鼓泡流化床气化炉(BFBG)和内径0.4 m的循环流化床气化炉(CFBG)中的气化特征进行了对比,重点考察了当量比对生物质气化特性的影响。实验结果表明,在相同当量比下,由于CFBG操作气速明显高于BFBG,床内强烈的气固传热传质,使得CFBG可以获得较高的热解速率,同时可以使CFBG在较高温度下运行。较高的运行温度不仅有利于二次裂解气化反应,使可燃气体质量明显好于BFBG,同时也减少了燃气中焦油的量。在较低气化当量比下(ER≤0.28),CFBG比BFBG可以获得更高的气体产率、碳转化率和气体效率;在较高当量比下,(ER>0.28),CFBG和BFBG的气体产率、碳转化率和气体效率则相差不大。 The performance of sawdust gasification in a 0.3 m × 0.3 m bubbling fluidized bed gasifier (BFBG) is compared to that in the φ 0.4 m circulating fluidized bed gasifier (CFBG). The effects of fluidization velocity on the biomass gasification in two fluidized beds were analyzed. Due to the higher fluidization velocity and intensive mass and momentum transfer between gas and solids, CFBG has a faster pyrolysis rate than BFBG and can be operated at higher temperature with the same ER, which facilitates the second gasification and cracking of tar to improve the gas quality and reduce the tar content in gas. At low ER ( ER ≤0. 28 ), the gas yield, carbon conversion and gasification efficiency of CFBG is higher than BFBG' s ; however at higher ER ( ER 〉 0.28 ), there is little difference between CFBG and BFBG.
出处 《燃料化学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期417-421,共5页 Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划 2003AA514010) 广东省自然科学基金(003045) 广东省科技计划项目(2004A11007002)
关键词 生物质 气化 鼓泡流化床 循环流化床 biomass gasification bubbling fluidized gasifier circulating fluidized bed gasifier
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1林伟刚,宋文立.丹麦生物质发电的现状和研究发展趋势[J].燃料化学学报,2005,33(6):650-655. 被引量:41
  • 2WUJZ,XUB Y,LUOZF,ZHOUXG.Performance analysis ofabiomass circulating fluidizedbed gasifier[J].Biomass Bioenergy,1992,3(2):105-110.
  • 3LI X T,GRACE J R,LIM C J WATKINSON A P,CHEN H P,KIM J R.Biomass gasification in a circulating fluidized bed[J].Biomass Bioenergy,2004,26(2):171-193.
  • 4MCKENDRY P.Energy production from biomass (part 3):Gasification technologies[J].Bioresour Technol,2002,83 (1):55-63.
  • 5WAMNECKE R.Gasification of biomass:Comparison of fixed bed and fluidized bed gasifier[J].Biomass Bioenergy,2000,18 (6):489-497.
  • 6van der DRIFT A,van DOORN J,VERMEULEN J W.Ten residual biomass fuels for circulating fluidized-bed gasification[J].Biomass Bioenergy,2001,20(1):45-56.
  • 7GILA J,CORELLAB J,AZNARA M P,CABALLERO M A.Biomass gasification in atmospheric and bubbling fluidized bed:Effect of the type of gasifying agent on the product distribution[J].Biomass Bioenergy,1999,17 (5):389-403.
  • 8NARVAEZI,ORIOA,AZNARMP,CORELLA J.Biomass gasification with airin an atmospheric bubbling fluidizedbed:Effect ofsixoperational variables on the quality of the produced raw gas[J].Ind Eng Chem Res,1996,35(7):2110-2120.
  • 9LU P M,XIONG Z H,CHANG J,WU C Z,CHENY,ZHU J X.An experimental study on biomass air-steam gasification in a fluidized bed[J].Bioresour Technol,2004,95(1):95-101.
  • 10米铁,张春林,刘武标,陈汉平,刘德昌.流化床作为生物质气化反应器试验研究[J].化学工程,2003,31(5):26-30. 被引量:24

二级参考文献37

共引文献163

同被引文献66

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部