期刊文献+

语言研究框架中的事件相关电位技术——句子理解与二语学习 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 文章在说明语言研究特点的基础上,介绍事件相关电位技术(ERP)研究方法的基本特点及其研究语言的基本路径,阐释利用ERP研究语言的意义及其相关的研究成果。其重点是句子理解与语言学习,尤其是二语学习的ERP研究新进展。最后,展望语言研究的发展趋势。
作者 常欣 王沛
机构地区 西北师范大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期87-90,共4页 Foreign Language Research
基金 "西北师范大学知识与科技创新工程资助项目"(编号CX03-01)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kutas, M. & HiUyard, S.A. Reading Senseless Sentences : Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity [ J ]. Science, 1980 (207) : 203-205.
  • 2McLaughlin, J. Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. Neural Correlates of Second Language Word Lemming: Minimal Instruction Produces Rapid Change [J]. Nature Neuroscience, 2004(7): 703-704.
  • 3Neville H J, Mills D L, & Lawson D L. Fractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods [J]. Cerebral Cortex, 1992(2): 244-258
  • 4Osterhout, L. , Bersiek, M., & MeLaughlin, J. Brain Potentials Reflect Violations of Gender Stereotypes [J]. Memory & Cognition, 1997(25) : 273-285.
  • 5Osterhout, L. , McLaughlin, J. , & Bersick, M. Event- related Brain Potentials and Human Language [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1997( 1 ) : 203--209.
  • 6Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1999 (14): 283-317.
  • 7Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J. , Bersick, M. Event- related Brain Potentials and Human Language [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1997(1): 203-209.
  • 8刘燕妮,舒华.ERP与语言研究[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):296-302. 被引量:33

二级参考文献31

  • 1[24]Friederici A D, Pfeifer E, Hahne A. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic morphological, and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1993, 1: 183~192
  • 2[25]Neville H J, Mills D L, Lawson D L. Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex, 1992, 2: 244~258
  • 3[26]Osterhout L, Holcomb P J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and languages, 1992, 31: 785~804
  • 4[27]Osterhout L, Nicol J. On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and cognitive Process, 1999, 14: 283~317
  • 5[28]Ainsworth-Darnell K, Shulman H G, Boland J E. Dissociating Brain Response to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 1998, 38: 112~130
  • 6[29]Gunter T C, Friederici A D, Gagbem A. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2000, 12: 556~568
  • 7[30]Friederici A D, Hahne A, Mecklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potentials effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1996, 22: 1219~1248
  • 8[31]Van Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown C. Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1997, 23: 787~806
  • 9[33]Wei J H, Peng D L, Yang Z L et al. The hemispheric difference of semantic processing of Chinese characters in two dimensions as revealed by ERPs. Neuroreport, 2001, 12(17): 1697~1701
  • 10[34]Wei J H, Luo Y J. The ERP study of semantic association of Chinese characters with half-visual field presentation. In: I Hashimoto, R Kakigi ed. Recent Advances in Human Neurophysiology. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science B.V, 1998. 715~724

共引文献32

同被引文献130

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部