摘要
本文对阿马蒂亚·森的食物获取权理论与传统的解释饥荒的食物供给量下降(FoodAvailabilityDecline,FAD)理论的关系进行分析,得出:在解释饥荒的发生时两者都具有解释能力,但在解释饥荒的分布上,FAD不具解释力度,本文实证检验了这一结论。在林毅夫和杨涛提出的城市偏向基础上,指出缺粮区的划分才是决定饥荒分布的真正原因,饥荒的分布是阶层性的,各自食物获取权的优先顺序才是遭受饥荒影响程度的直接因素。
This paper on Sen＇s food entitlement theory and the traditional theory to explain famine with food supply declined （Food Availability Decline-FAD） positioning that both are the real cause of famine ,but FAD could not explain the distribution of famine. On the base of urban bias by Lin Yifu and Yangtao（2000） ,the paper indicates that the real causes of famine distribution are the food deficit areas, and the distribution has class nature. The priorities of their entitlements to food is subjected to the direct impact of famine.
出处
《经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第8期104-113,共10页
Economic Research Journal
基金
南京农业大学经济管理学院项目资助
关键词
饥荒
食物获取权
FAD
缺粮区
Famine
Food Entitlement
FAD
Food-deficit Areas
