摘要
目的:编制抑郁症心理护理效果自评量表并对其信度效度进行检验。方法:根据心理卫生评定量表的编制方法及临床工作实践,筛选条目,并进行信度和效度检验。测量对象为52例抑郁症病人。结果:抑郁症心理护理效果自评量表包括12个项目.Cronbacha α系数为0.879,分半信度0.885,重测信度0.65。自评量表总分与各项目的相关系数0.365-0.815之间(P〈0.01),52例抑郁瘟病人中,实验组(n=26),经4周心理护理后与HAMD的相关为-0.522(P〈0.01),对照组(n=26)为-0.263(P〉0.05),两组患者自评量表分比较有非常显著的统计学差异(t=11.13,P〈0.001)。结论:自编抑郁症心理护理效果自评量表有一定的信度和效度,基本符合心理测量学的要求,可以在临床工作中试用。
Objective:Establish self- rating scale for psychological nursing effecting on the depression patients and examine it's reliability validity. Methods:refer to psychological hygiene evaluation handbook , based on clinical working practice, filter items, Examine the reliability and validity. Results : self - rating scale for psychological nursing effecting on the depressive patients consists of 12 items, The Cronbach a 0. 879, Guttman Split - Half Coefficient 0. 885, The test - retest reliability 0.65. The correlation coefficient of the score of self - rating scale and various items 0. 365 - 0.815 ( P 〈 0.01 ) . 52 depressive patients, After 4 weeks nursing , the correlation coefficient of the experiment group( n = 26) with HAMD is - 0. 522 ( P 〈 0.01 ), control group is - 0. 263 ( P 〉 0.05 ). by t, two groups self- rating scale has remarkable difference (t = 11.13, P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusions: self - rating scale for psychological nursing has certain reliability and validity, conformed to the requirement of psychometry basically, it can be tried out in the clinical work.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2006年第17期799-801,共3页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词
抑郁症
心理护理
心理护理效果自评量表
信度
效度
Depression
Psychological nursing
Self-rating scale for psychological nursing effecting
Relibility Validity