期刊文献+

垂叶榕隐头果内小蜂群落结构与生境关系的初步研究 被引量:9

Community structure of fig wasp in Ficus benjamina in different habitats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 垂叶榕(Ficusbenjamina)是一种世界上广泛栽培的绿化树种,但是关于其隐头果内小蜂群落结构的研究国内外很少涉及。我们根据植被覆盖度和干扰程度差异在西双版纳州勐仑镇选择了3块不同的样地,采集垂叶榕隐头果180个,统计其中的榕小蜂种类和数量。结果表明:共鉴定出榕小蜂13种,隶属于膜翅目小蜂总科中的8个属,其中Eupristinakoningsbergeri为传粉榕小蜂,其余12种为非传粉小蜂;3个样地中的小蜂群落多样性指数、丰富度存在显著差异,植被覆盖度高、干扰小的样地内小蜂群落多样性指数、丰富度显著高于其他样地;非传粉小蜂在产卵时更倾向于选择植被覆盖度高、干扰相对小的生境,且非传粉小蜂的存在对传粉榕小蜂的繁殖有着显著的负面影响。 Ficus are species-specifically pollinated by Chalcidoid wasps (Agaonidae). Each monoecious fig species shelters a wasp community of pollinator and nonpollinators. Ficus benjamina is a monoecious tree worldwide cultivated for ornamental purposes, but the fig wasp community inside the syconium of this species is still little known. In order to study the fig wasp community structure of F. benjamina in different habitats, we collected 180 syconia from three different study sites distinct in plant coverage and disturbance level in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan. In all syconia, 49,149 specimens were collected, consisting of 13 species of fig wasps from 8 genera of Chaleidoidae. Eupristina koningsbergeri was the pollinator, whereas the others were nonpollinators. The species diversity and abundance of the fig wasp community were significantly different in the three study sites, and were significantly higher in the site with high plant coverage and relatively little disturbance. This result indicates that nonpollinators are inclined to oviposit in flowers of F. benjamina in habitats with high plant coverage and relatively little disturbance. The data also suggest that the correlation between pollinator and nonpollinators inside the syconium is significantly negative.
出处 《生物多样性》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期340-344,共5页 Biodiversity Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(30571507 30200220 30170171)
关键词 榕树 传粉榕小蜂 非传粉小蜂 共生 群落结构 Ficus, pollinating fig wasp, nonpollinating fig wasp, coexistence, community structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献82

  • 1陈勇,李宏庆,马炜梁.榕树-传粉者共生体系的研究[J].生物多样性,1997,5(1):31-35. 被引量:22
  • 2Cook JM. 2003. Mutualists with attitude: Coevolving between fig wasps and figs[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(5): 241-248.
  • 3Cushman GH, Compton SG, Zachariades C, Ware AB, Nefdt RJC, Rashbrook VK. 1998. Geographic and taxonomic distribution of a positive interaction: Ant-tended homopterans indirectly benefit figs across southern Africa[J]. Oecologia, 116(3): 373-380.
  • 4Dejean A, Bourgoin T, Gibernau M. 1997. Ant species that protect figs against other ants: Result of territoriality induced by a mutualistic homopteran[J]. Ecoscience, 4(4): 446-453.
  • 5Herre EA. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: Exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14(2): 49-53.
  • 6Holldobler B. 1983. Territorial behavior in the green tree ant (Oecophylla smaragdina)[J]. Biotropica, 15(4): 241-250.
  • 7Holldobler B, Wilson EO. 1977. Weaver ants: Social establishment and maintenance of territory[J]. Science, 195(4281): 900-902.
  • 8Holldobler B, Lumsden CJ. 1980. Territorial strategies in ants[J]. Science, 210(4471): 732-739.
  • 9Janzen DH. 1979. How to be a fig[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10: 13-51.
  • 10Michaloud G, Carriere S, Kobbi M. 1996. Exceptions to the one: One relationship between African fig trees and their fig wasp pollinators: Possible evolutionary scenarios[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 23(4): 513-520.

共引文献24

同被引文献88

引证文献9

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部