期刊文献+

中国的男孩偏好和婚姻挤压——初婚与再婚市场的综合分析 被引量:96

Son Preference and the Marriage Squeeze in China: An Integrated Analysis of the First Marriage and Remarriage Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国强烈的男孩偏好和对女性的歧视导致了婚姻市场上严重的男性婚姻挤压。苓文使用中国2000年普查数据和所预测的2001~2050年人口数据,结合初婚和再婚市场设计了度量婚姻挤压的指标.测度了2001~2050年中国的婚姻挤压程度,考察了男孩偏好和再婚因素对中国未来婚姻挤压的影响。结果表明未来中国婚姻市场每年有10%~15%男性过剩人口,达到120万人。男孩偏好导致的高出生性别比显著影响未来婚姻市场,而再婚人口对婚姻市场上过剩人口也有显著影响。 In China, strong son preference and discrimination against girls have resulted in male squeeze in the marriage market. Using projection data and marriage information in 2000 census, we devise a series of indexes taking account of both first marriage and remarriage, measure the extent of male squeeze in China' s market from 2001 to 2050, and analyze the impact of son preference and remarriage on marriage squeeze. The results show that there will be 10% to 15% excess males every year in the marriage market; and the number will reach 1.2 million. Still the SRBs caused by son preference significant influence the marriage market. Remarriage exerts great impact on the numbers and proportions of excess males.
出处 《人口与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期1-8,共8页 Population & Economics
基金 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-04-0931) 西安交通大学"985工程"二期重点项目(07200701)的联合资助
关键词 男孩偏好 婚姻市场 婚姻挤压 出生性别比 再婚 son preference marriage market marriage squeeze sex ratio at birth remarriage
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Lamanna, M. A. and A. Riedmann. 1991. Marriages and Families: Making choices and Facing Change. Fourth Edition. Belmont,California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  • 2郭志刚 邓国胜.中国婚姻拥挤研究.市场与人口分析,2000,(3):68-72.
  • 3Beiles, A. 1994. A buffered interaction between sex ratio, age difference at marriage, and population growth in humans, and their significance for sex ratio evolution. Hereditary, 33. S, 265ff.
  • 4Tuljapurkar, S, N. Li, and M. W. Fddman. 1995. High sex ratios in China's future. Science, 267: 874-876.
  • 5Peston, D. L, K. L. Glover. 2005. Too Many Males: Marriage Market Implications of Gender Imbalances in China. Paper presented at the 25^th IUSSP World Population Conference. Tours, France. July 18 - 23.
  • 6Pander, R. 2003. Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: the role of siblings. Demography 40(3): 395-418.
  • 7Mishra, V, T. K. Roy and R. D. Retherford. 2004. Sex differentials in childhood feeding health care, and nutritional, stares in India.Population and Development Review 30 (2) : 269 - 295.
  • 8Das Gupta, M. and S. Li. 1999. Gender bias in China, South Korea and India 1920 - 1990: The effects of war, famine, and fertility decline. Development and Change 30 (3) : 619 - 652.
  • 9Schoen, R. 1988. Modeling Multigroup Populations. New York and Longdon: Plenum Press.
  • 10United Nations. 1983. Manual X: Indirect Techniques for Demographic Estimation. New York.

同被引文献1295

引证文献96

二级引证文献708

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部