适用于大学生人际价值观量表的编制

Compilation of the interpersonal value scale for college students

目的:编制适用于大学生人际价值观的量表。方法:于2005年选择西南师范大学、西南农业大学、重庆涪陵师范学院、川北医学院、西华师范大学、四川大学6所学校在校学生1000人作为大学生价值观量表调查对象,取样尽量做到各年级和性别的均衡。在编制前以西南师范大学和西南农业大学的学生220人作为大学生人际价值观开放式问卷的被试,另选研究生10人作为访谈对象。在问卷调查和文献综述的基础上,运用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析技术,进行大学生价值观量表结构探讨。大学生人际价值观量表由3个主因子构成和10个次因子构成,主因子分别为心理因素、生理因素和社会因素。每一个主因子下又包含若干次级因素:心理因素包括感情、能力、性格和志趣4个因子;生理因素包括相貌和健康2个因素;社会因素包括服饰、名声、经历和帮助4个因素。量表采用5级评分标准。以学校为单位进行团体施测。并对样本分量表的数据进行项目分析、探索性和验证性因素分析。结果:发放问卷1000份,回收合格问卷923份。有效率92.3%。①对总量表进行因素分析,经过最大方差旋转后,提取3个主因子,共解释总方差的67.296%,3个主因子对全量表具有较强的代表性。②3个主因子的题目形成3个分量表,对分量表的数据进行主成分分析,分量表1心理因素、分量表2生理因素、分量表3社会因素在进行最大方差旋转的情况下分别解释55.435%的总变异、57.189%的总变异和54.852%的总变异。③心理因素、生理因素和社会因素的内部一致性α信度系数分别为0.69、0.88、0.82;重测信度分别为0.76、0.78、0.85。④量表的各个题目都来自开放式问卷的结果,并且与文献综述、教师和学生的访谈所了解到的内容基本一致。⑤各个因素与问卷总分之间的相关矩阵和验证性因素分析检验量表的结构效度,各个主因子次因子与总量表的相关都较高,因子之间的相关相对较低,符合编制的基本要求。AMOSForWindows2000模型进一步通过验证性因素分析确定模型对实际数据的拟合程度,χ2/df的值均小于5,拟合良好性指标、调整拟合良好性指标、常规拟合指标、比较拟合指标值均在0.85以上,RMSEA的90%置信区间上限在0.08以下,模型的拟合效果比较好。⑥20名辅导员和老师站在学生角度填写的问卷与学生所填写的问卷相关较高且达到显著性水平(r=0.826,P<0.01)。结论:基于国内外相关文献的基础上编制大学生人际价值观量表,严格遵循心理测验量表的编制程序,数据结果显示量表具有较好的信度和效度,可广泛地用于大学生人际价值观的施测。

AIM： To compile an interpersonal value scale to be applicable to college students. METHODS： Totally 1 000 non-graduated students from Southwest University, Southwest Agricultural University, Chongqing Fuling Normal University, North Sichuan Medical College, China West Normal University and Sichuan University were enrolled in 2005 as investigational subjects of interpersonal value scale for college students. The sampling was balanced in grade and sex. Before compiling 220 students from Southwest University and Southwest Agricultural University were enrolled as tests for opening questionnaire of interpersonal value scale; 10 postgraduates were enrolled as interview subjects. On the foundation of the questionnaire and the cultural heritage overview, the quest factor analysis and the verification factors analysis the technique were applied to explore tile value structure. The interpersonal value scale for college students was composed of 3 main factors and 10 sub-factors. The main factors included psychological factor, physiological factor and social factor, and every main factor contained several subsequent factors. The psychological factor was consisted of emotion, ability, characteristics and imerest： The physiological factor was consisted of appearance and health; The social factor was consisted of clothing, reputation, experience and assistance. The scale used 5-grade scoring criteria. Taking school as a unit grouping evaluation was performed. The data of sample sub-scale were done with item analysis, exploratory and verifying factor analysis. RESULTS： A total of 1 000 questionnaires were sent out, and 923 questionnaires were qualified, with the effective rate of 92.3%. ①The factor analysis was carried on to the total amount watch, after biggest square differed to revolve, 3 main factors were withdrawn. 67.296% that total square were explained totally. Three main factors had the stronger representative to the whole quantity form.②The topic of 3 main factors became 3 subscales, carrying on the main composition analysis to the data of the subscale, one psychological factor of the sub-scale was carried on biggest variance under rotary circumstance explaining 55.435% total variation; The sub-scale 2, physiological factor was hermeneutic under the condition of carrying on the biggest variance revolving 57.189% total variation; The 3 social factor of the sub-scale explained 54.852% total variation under the condition of carrying on the biggest variance. ③a reliability coefficient of the psychological factor, the physiological factor and social factor distinguished to 0.69, 0.88 and 0.82, and the heavy measure reliability distinguished to 0.76, 0.78 and 0,85. ④Each topic of this research all came from the result of the opening type questionnaire, and mostly associated with review and the contents of teachers and students＇ interview. ⑤Correlation and the verification factors that adopted the each factor and questionnaire total score analyzed the structure validity of the examination quantity scale. A factor of each main factor and total amount scale all were higher, but relation was lower between the factors, which was accorded with the compiled requirement, This enunciation measures the AMOS For Windows2000 further passed to verify the analytical certain model of sex factor to draw up to match the degree to the actual data, the value of the X^2/df was less than 5. The values of the goodness of fit index （GFI）, adjusted goodness of fit index （AGFI）, normed fit index （NFI）, comparative fit index （CFI） were all above 0.85, and RMSEA 90% place to believe the zone upper limit was below 0,08. The models had good fit effect. ⑥The effect at the same time, in 20 guidance members and teachers to fill in this questionnaire in students＇ angle was higher with significant level （r=0,826, P〈 0.01）, CONCLUSION： The interpersonal value scale compiled according to internal and external related literatures is strictly accorded with the process of drawing up psychological testing scale, The results of data reveal that this scale has good reliability and validity, and can be widely used in the measurement of interpersonal value.